Safety and efficacy of the infraclavicular nerve block performed at low current

Mitchell T. Keschner, Heidi Michelsen, Andrew D. Rosenberg, Daniel Wambold, David B. Albert, Robert Altman, Steven Green, Martin Posner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

It has recently been suggested that peripheral nerve or plexus blocks performed with the use of a nerve stimulator at low currents (<0.5 mA) may result in neurologic damage. We studied the infraclavicular nerve block, performed with the use of a nerve stimulator and an insulated needle, in a prospective evaluation of efficacy and safety. During a one-year period, 248 patients undergoing infraclavicular nerve block were evaluated for block success rate and incidence of neurologic complication. All blocks were performed with the use of a nerve stimulator and an insulated needle at ≤0.3 mA. Success rate was 94%, which increased to 96% with surgical infiltration of local anesthetic. There were no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications noted. After one week, only one patient had a neurologic complaint, and this was surgically related, referable to surgery performed on the radial nerve. We conclude that infraclavicular nerve blocks performed at low currents (≤0.3 mA) are safe and effective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-111
Number of pages5
JournalPain Practice
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Infraclavicular nerve block
  • Low current
  • Neurologic complications
  • Regional anesthesia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and efficacy of the infraclavicular nerve block performed at low current'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this