TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and efficacy of different prophylactic anticoagulation dosing regimens in critically and non-critically ill patients with COVID-19
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AU - Ortega-Paz, Luis
AU - Galli, Mattia
AU - Capodanno, Davide
AU - Franchi, Francesco
AU - Rollini, Fabiana
AU - Bikdeli, Behnood
AU - Mehran, Roxana
AU - Montalescot, Gilles
AU - Gibson, C. Michael
AU - Lopes, Renato D.
AU - Andreotti, Felicita
AU - Angiolillo, Dominick J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - Background The clinical impact of different prophylactic anticoagulation regimens among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear. We pooled evidence from available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide insights on this topic. Methods and We searched for RCTs comparing treatment with an escalated-dose (intermediate-dose or therapeutic-dose) vs. a results standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation regimen in critically and non-critically ill COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization and without a formal indication for anticoagulation. The primary efficacy endpoint was all-cause death, and the primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. Seven RCTs were identified, including 5154 patients followed on an average of 33 days. Compared to standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, escalated-dose prophylactic anticoagulation was not associated with a reduction of all-cause death [17.8% vs. 18.6%; risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.18] but was associated with an increase in major bleeding (2.4% vs. 1.4%; RR 1.73, 95%CI 1.15-2.60). Compared to prophylactic anticoagulation used at a standard dose, an escalated dose was associated with lower rates of venous thromboembolism (2.5% vs. 4.7%; RR 0.55, 95%CI 0.41-0.74) without a significant effect on myocardial infarction (RR 0.80, 95%CI 0.47-1.36), stroke (RR 0.94, 95%CI 0.43-2.09), or systemic arterial embolism (RR 1.20, 95%CI 0.29-4.95). There were no significant interactions in the subgroup analysis for critically and non-critically ill patients. Conclusions Our findings provide comprehensive and high-quality evidence for the use of standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation over an escalated-dose regimen as routine standard of care for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who do not have an indication for therapeutic anticoagulation, irrespective of disease severity.
AB - Background The clinical impact of different prophylactic anticoagulation regimens among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear. We pooled evidence from available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide insights on this topic. Methods and We searched for RCTs comparing treatment with an escalated-dose (intermediate-dose or therapeutic-dose) vs. a results standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation regimen in critically and non-critically ill COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization and without a formal indication for anticoagulation. The primary efficacy endpoint was all-cause death, and the primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. Seven RCTs were identified, including 5154 patients followed on an average of 33 days. Compared to standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, escalated-dose prophylactic anticoagulation was not associated with a reduction of all-cause death [17.8% vs. 18.6%; risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.18] but was associated with an increase in major bleeding (2.4% vs. 1.4%; RR 1.73, 95%CI 1.15-2.60). Compared to prophylactic anticoagulation used at a standard dose, an escalated dose was associated with lower rates of venous thromboembolism (2.5% vs. 4.7%; RR 0.55, 95%CI 0.41-0.74) without a significant effect on myocardial infarction (RR 0.80, 95%CI 0.47-1.36), stroke (RR 0.94, 95%CI 0.43-2.09), or systemic arterial embolism (RR 1.20, 95%CI 0.29-4.95). There were no significant interactions in the subgroup analysis for critically and non-critically ill patients. Conclusions Our findings provide comprehensive and high-quality evidence for the use of standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation over an escalated-dose regimen as routine standard of care for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who do not have an indication for therapeutic anticoagulation, irrespective of disease severity.
KW - Anticoagulant therapy
KW - Bleeding
KW - Coronavirus disease 2019
KW - Death
KW - Thrombosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139375679&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab070
DO - 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab070
M3 - Article
C2 - 34519777
AN - SCOPUS:85139375679
SN - 2055-6837
VL - 8
SP - 677
EP - 686
JO - European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
JF - European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
IS - 7
ER -