TY - JOUR
T1 - Sacral neuromodulator interstim surgical site infection
T2 - Two case reports
AU - Shahryarinejad, Azin
AU - Vardy, Michael D.
AU - Filmar, Gilad
AU - Walter, Mary Ellen
AU - Kocher, Jeffrey
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Objective: The surgical site infection rate of sacral neuromodulator placement for the treatment of refractory urge urinary incontinence is reported to be between 5% and 7.9%. Our objective was to report the investigation process of these infections and a possible source for their occurrence. Methods: We performed infection control surveillance of two patients that underwent sacral neuromodulator placement on the same date, in the same operating room, and by the same staff who developed similar sacral cellulitis postoperatively. Results: The investigation revealed Staphylococcus aureus infections with a common antibiogram in both patients. Nasal cultures of all personnel involved in their care, showed Staphylococcus aureus with the same antibiogram only in a Medtronic representative who had manipulated the InterStim settings. Genetic analysis showed this to be an identical strain in one patient infection. Conclusions: The postoperative manipulation of device settings may be a source of surgical site infection, and infection control practices including strict hand washing, gloves, gown and mask may be warranted.
AB - Objective: The surgical site infection rate of sacral neuromodulator placement for the treatment of refractory urge urinary incontinence is reported to be between 5% and 7.9%. Our objective was to report the investigation process of these infections and a possible source for their occurrence. Methods: We performed infection control surveillance of two patients that underwent sacral neuromodulator placement on the same date, in the same operating room, and by the same staff who developed similar sacral cellulitis postoperatively. Results: The investigation revealed Staphylococcus aureus infections with a common antibiogram in both patients. Nasal cultures of all personnel involved in their care, showed Staphylococcus aureus with the same antibiogram only in a Medtronic representative who had manipulated the InterStim settings. Genetic analysis showed this to be an identical strain in one patient infection. Conclusions: The postoperative manipulation of device settings may be a source of surgical site infection, and infection control practices including strict hand washing, gloves, gown and mask may be warranted.
KW - Infection control surveillance
KW - InterStim
KW - Surgical site infection
KW - Urinary incontinence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053006774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181f5abe2
DO - 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181f5abe2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:80053006774
SN - 2151-8378
VL - 16
SP - 362
EP - 364
JO - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
JF - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
IS - 6
ER -