Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Routine use of unilateral and bilateral radial arteries for coronary artery bypass graft surgery

  • Richard F. Brodman
  • , Rosemary Frame
  • , Margarita Camacho
  • , Alan Chen
  • , Eric Hu
  • , Ingrid Hollinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

121 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives. This study sought to evaluate the routine use of radial artery (RA) grafts in patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization. Background. Previous long-term studies have documented poor patency of saphenous vein grafts compared with internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts. Methods. We performed a prospective review of 175 of 249 consecutive patients. Results. Fifty-four patients had bilateral RAs harvested. Mean number (±SD) of grafts/patient was 3.27 ± 0.93, with 2.76 ± 0.97 arterial grafts; a mean of 1.53 ± 0.68 grafts were performed with the RA. The operative mortality rate was 1.6%. No deaths were related to RA grafts, and there were no RA harvest site hematomas or infections. Transient dysesthesia 1 day to 4 weeks in duration occurred in the distribution of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve in six extremities (2.6%). Elective cardiac catheterization in 60 patients at 12 weeks postoperatively demonstrated a 95.7% patency rate. Conclusions. Because of potential benefit of long-term patency associated with arterial grafts, minimal morbidity and mortality associated with use of the RA and excellent short-term patency rates, we cautiously recommend use of one or both RAs as additional conduits to be used concomitantly with the ITA for arterial revascularization of the coronary arteries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)959-963
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Routine use of unilateral and bilateral radial arteries for coronary artery bypass graft surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this