TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of Surgeon Demographic Factors in the Management of L4-5 Grade I Spondylolisthesis
T2 - A Survey by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative
AU - Muthu, Sathish
AU - Simister, Samuel K.
AU - Shahzad, Hania
AU - Le, Hai Van
AU - Ambrosio, Luca
AU - Corluka, Stipe
AU - Vadala, Gianluca
AU - Hsieh, Patrick C.
AU - Virk, Michael
AU - Yoon, Tim
AU - Cho, Samuel K.
AU - Ao Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative, Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Objective: We explore the demographic factors amongst surgeons responsible for decision-making in the management of Grade I L4-5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis(DLS). Methods: A survey presenting three clinical scenarios of DLS with varying degrees of neurological compression and instability was distributed to the AOSpine members globally to ascertain surgical management preferences. Management options such as decompression only or decompression and fusion and the techniques that would be employed were presented to the responders. Results: After dissemination, 479 surgeons responded to the survey. Direct decompression was preferred for all three scenarios with and without neurologic deficits(82.5, 81.2, and 56.8%), with the majority favoring open procedures over minimally invasive or endoscopic procedures. Notably, younger, less experienced, and fellowship-trained surgeons showed a higher inclination toward minimally invasive and indirect decompression methods. A strong preference for surgical fusion over decompression(75.2, 92.5 and 86.6%, respectively) was also significantly observed, reflecting a general consensus on the need to achieve segmental stability. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate a pronounced preference for direct decompression and fusion among a group of global surgeons when treating L4-5 Grade I DLS across all demographics. This indicates a consensus on achieving decompression and stability; however, there are some trends indicating the impact of surgical management based on age, experience, and training of the treating providers. These findings suggest an evolution of surgical interventions toward less invasive techniques, particularly among younger surgeons, highlighting the need for global education to adopt innovative approaches in the management of DLS.
AB - Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Objective: We explore the demographic factors amongst surgeons responsible for decision-making in the management of Grade I L4-5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis(DLS). Methods: A survey presenting three clinical scenarios of DLS with varying degrees of neurological compression and instability was distributed to the AOSpine members globally to ascertain surgical management preferences. Management options such as decompression only or decompression and fusion and the techniques that would be employed were presented to the responders. Results: After dissemination, 479 surgeons responded to the survey. Direct decompression was preferred for all three scenarios with and without neurologic deficits(82.5, 81.2, and 56.8%), with the majority favoring open procedures over minimally invasive or endoscopic procedures. Notably, younger, less experienced, and fellowship-trained surgeons showed a higher inclination toward minimally invasive and indirect decompression methods. A strong preference for surgical fusion over decompression(75.2, 92.5 and 86.6%, respectively) was also significantly observed, reflecting a general consensus on the need to achieve segmental stability. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate a pronounced preference for direct decompression and fusion among a group of global surgeons when treating L4-5 Grade I DLS across all demographics. This indicates a consensus on achieving decompression and stability; however, there are some trends indicating the impact of surgical management based on age, experience, and training of the treating providers. These findings suggest an evolution of surgical interventions toward less invasive techniques, particularly among younger surgeons, highlighting the need for global education to adopt innovative approaches in the management of DLS.
KW - AO Spine
KW - degenerative
KW - demographic factors
KW - lumbar
KW - spondylolisthesis
KW - survey
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105000488999
U2 - 10.1177/21925682251324469
DO - 10.1177/21925682251324469
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105000488999
SN - 2192-5682
VL - 15
SP - 3590
EP - 3600
JO - Global Spine Journal
JF - Global Spine Journal
IS - 8
ER -