Robotics for neuroendovascular intervention: Background and primer

Kazim H. Narsinh; Ricardo Paez; Kerstin Mueller; M. Travis Caton; Amanda Baker; Randall T. Higashida; Van V. Halbach; Christopher F. Dowd; Matthew R. Amans; Steven W. Hetts; Alexander M. Norbash; Daniel L. Cooke

doi:10.1177/19714009211034829

Robotics for neuroendovascular intervention: Background and primer

Kazim H. Narsinh, Ricardo Paez, Kerstin Mueller, M. Travis Caton, Amanda Baker, Randall T. Higashida, Van V. Halbach, Christopher F. Dowd, Matthew R. Amans, Steven W. Hetts, Alexander M. Norbash, Daniel L. Cooke

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

The simultaneous growth of robotic-assisted surgery and telemedicine in recent years has only been accelerated by the recent coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Robotic assistance for neurovascular intervention has garnered significant interest due to opportunities for tele-stroke models of care for remote underserved areas. Lessons learned from medical robots in interventional cardiology and neurosurgery have contributed to incremental but vital advances in medical robotics despite important limitations. In this article, we discuss robot types and their clinical justification and ethics, as well as a general overview on available robots in thoracic/abdominal surgery, neurosurgery, and cardiac electrophysiology. We conclude with current clinical research in neuroendovascular intervention and a perspective on future directions.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	25-35
Number of pages	11
Journal	Neuroradiology Journal
Volume	35
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009211034829
State	Published - Feb 2022
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Robotics
ethics
neurointerventional
stroke
telemedicine

Access to Document

10.1177/19714009211034829

Cite this

@article{9e899849bfe1427e92aa484db73a60a7,

title = "Robotics for neuroendovascular intervention: Background and primer",

abstract = "The simultaneous growth of robotic-assisted surgery and telemedicine in recent years has only been accelerated by the recent coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Robotic assistance for neurovascular intervention has garnered significant interest due to opportunities for tele-stroke models of care for remote underserved areas. Lessons learned from medical robots in interventional cardiology and neurosurgery have contributed to incremental but vital advances in medical robotics despite important limitations. In this article, we discuss robot types and their clinical justification and ethics, as well as a general overview on available robots in thoracic/abdominal surgery, neurosurgery, and cardiac electrophysiology. We conclude with current clinical research in neuroendovascular intervention and a perspective on future directions.",

keywords = "Robotics, ethics, neurointerventional, stroke, telemedicine",

author = "Narsinh, {Kazim H.} and Ricardo Paez and Kerstin Mueller and Caton, {M. Travis} and Amanda Baker and Higashida, {Randall T.} and Halbach, {Van V.} and Dowd, {Christopher F.} and Amans, {Matthew R.} and Hetts, {Steven W.} and Norbash, {Alexander M.} and Cooke, {Daniel L.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2021.",

year = "2022",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1177/19714009211034829",

language = "English",

volume = "35",

pages = "25--35",

journal = "Neuroradiology Journal",

issn = "1971-4009",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotics for neuroendovascular intervention

T2 - Background and primer

AU - Narsinh, Kazim H.

AU - Paez, Ricardo

AU - Mueller, Kerstin

AU - Caton, M. Travis

AU - Baker, Amanda

AU - Higashida, Randall T.

AU - Halbach, Van V.

AU - Dowd, Christopher F.

AU - Amans, Matthew R.

AU - Hetts, Steven W.

AU - Norbash, Alexander M.

AU - Cooke, Daniel L.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2021.

PY - 2022/2

Y1 - 2022/2

N2 - The simultaneous growth of robotic-assisted surgery and telemedicine in recent years has only been accelerated by the recent coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Robotic assistance for neurovascular intervention has garnered significant interest due to opportunities for tele-stroke models of care for remote underserved areas. Lessons learned from medical robots in interventional cardiology and neurosurgery have contributed to incremental but vital advances in medical robotics despite important limitations. In this article, we discuss robot types and their clinical justification and ethics, as well as a general overview on available robots in thoracic/abdominal surgery, neurosurgery, and cardiac electrophysiology. We conclude with current clinical research in neuroendovascular intervention and a perspective on future directions.

AB - The simultaneous growth of robotic-assisted surgery and telemedicine in recent years has only been accelerated by the recent coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Robotic assistance for neurovascular intervention has garnered significant interest due to opportunities for tele-stroke models of care for remote underserved areas. Lessons learned from medical robots in interventional cardiology and neurosurgery have contributed to incremental but vital advances in medical robotics despite important limitations. In this article, we discuss robot types and their clinical justification and ethics, as well as a general overview on available robots in thoracic/abdominal surgery, neurosurgery, and cardiac electrophysiology. We conclude with current clinical research in neuroendovascular intervention and a perspective on future directions.

KW - Robotics

KW - ethics

KW - neurointerventional

KW - stroke

KW - telemedicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112680829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/19714009211034829

DO - 10.1177/19714009211034829

M3 - Review article

C2 - 34398721

AN - SCOPUS:85112680829

SN - 1971-4009

VL - 35

SP - 25

EP - 35

JO - Neuroradiology Journal

JF - Neuroradiology Journal

IS - 1

ER -

Robotics for neuroendovascular intervention: Background and primer

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this