TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk Factors and Outcomes of Postoperative Macular Hole Formation after Vitrectomy for Myopic Traction Maculopathy
T2 - SCHISIS Report No. 2
AU - SCHISIS Study Group
AU - Wakabayashi, Taku
AU - Shiraki, Nobuhiko
AU - Tsuboi, Kotaro
AU - Oshima, Yusuke
AU - Abe, Kentaro
AU - Yamamoto, Yuki
AU - Hisashi, Fukuyama
AU - Baba, Keita
AU - Ishida, Yuichiro
AU - Otsuka, Yuki
AU - Shiraki, Akihiko
AU - Suzue, Masaki
AU - Hashimoto, Ryuya
AU - Venkatesh, Ramesh
AU - Chhablani, Jay
AU - Gomi, Fumi
AU - Kamei, Motohiro
AU - Maeno, Takatoshi
AU - Regillo, Carl D.
AU - Yonekawa, Yoshihiro
AU - Ikuno, Yasushi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Academy of Ophthalmology
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the incidence, pathogenesis, risk factors, and treatment outcomes of postoperative macular hole (MH) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for myopic traction maculopathy (MTM). Design: Multicenter, interventional, retrospective case series. Subjects: Consecutive eyes that underwent PPV for MTM with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Methods: We investigated the characteristics and treatment outcomes of postoperative MH after MTM surgery. Main Outcome Measures: Incidence, risk factors, and anatomic and visual outcomes of postoperative MH. Results: We included 207 eyes (207 patients) with a mean follow-up of 25.9 months. During follow-up, 24 (11.6%) eyes developed MH (10 with concurrent MH retinal detachment); 15 eyes within 30 days (early), 4 eyes between 31 and 180 days (intermediate), and 5 eyes after 180 days (late). Logistic regression analysis revealed male gender (odds ratio [OR], 2.917; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.198–7.100; P = 0.018), thinner preoperative choroidal thickness (OR, 0.988; 95% CI, 0.976–1.000; P = 0.048), and use of indocyanine green for internal limiting membrane peeling (OR, 2.960; 95% CI, 1.172–7.476; P = 0.022) as significant risk factors for postoperative MH. Internal limiting membrane peeling with a fovea-sparing technique tended to protect against postoperative MH, but it was not statistically significant (P = 0.096), because 1 eye still developed MH. Postoperative MHs were treated by observation (6 eyes), in-office octafluoropropane (C3F8) gas injection (7 eyes), or PPV (11 eyes). Macular hole closure was achieved in 20 eyes (83%). The hole closure rate was 67% (4/6 eyes) after observation, 71% (5/7 eyes) after C3F8 gas injection, and 91% (10/11 eyes) after PPV. However, visual outcomes were significantly worse for eyes with postoperative MH than those without (0.38 ± 0.43 vs. 0.68 ± 0.46; P = 0.002). Conclusions: Postoperative MH may occur in 11.6% of patients with MTM at any time after surgery. Retreatment resulted in relatively favorable anatomic closure but unfavorable visual outcomes. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the incidence, pathogenesis, risk factors, and treatment outcomes of postoperative macular hole (MH) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for myopic traction maculopathy (MTM). Design: Multicenter, interventional, retrospective case series. Subjects: Consecutive eyes that underwent PPV for MTM with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Methods: We investigated the characteristics and treatment outcomes of postoperative MH after MTM surgery. Main Outcome Measures: Incidence, risk factors, and anatomic and visual outcomes of postoperative MH. Results: We included 207 eyes (207 patients) with a mean follow-up of 25.9 months. During follow-up, 24 (11.6%) eyes developed MH (10 with concurrent MH retinal detachment); 15 eyes within 30 days (early), 4 eyes between 31 and 180 days (intermediate), and 5 eyes after 180 days (late). Logistic regression analysis revealed male gender (odds ratio [OR], 2.917; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.198–7.100; P = 0.018), thinner preoperative choroidal thickness (OR, 0.988; 95% CI, 0.976–1.000; P = 0.048), and use of indocyanine green for internal limiting membrane peeling (OR, 2.960; 95% CI, 1.172–7.476; P = 0.022) as significant risk factors for postoperative MH. Internal limiting membrane peeling with a fovea-sparing technique tended to protect against postoperative MH, but it was not statistically significant (P = 0.096), because 1 eye still developed MH. Postoperative MHs were treated by observation (6 eyes), in-office octafluoropropane (C3F8) gas injection (7 eyes), or PPV (11 eyes). Macular hole closure was achieved in 20 eyes (83%). The hole closure rate was 67% (4/6 eyes) after observation, 71% (5/7 eyes) after C3F8 gas injection, and 91% (10/11 eyes) after PPV. However, visual outcomes were significantly worse for eyes with postoperative MH than those without (0.38 ± 0.43 vs. 0.68 ± 0.46; P = 0.002). Conclusions: Postoperative MH may occur in 11.6% of patients with MTM at any time after surgery. Retreatment resulted in relatively favorable anatomic closure but unfavorable visual outcomes. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
KW - High myopia
KW - Myopic foveoschisis
KW - Myopic traction maculopathy
KW - Pars plana vitrectomy
KW - Postoperative macular hole
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164601772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.oret.2023.05.017
DO - 10.1016/j.oret.2023.05.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 37257585
AN - SCOPUS:85164601772
SN - 2468-6530
VL - 7
SP - 779
EP - 787
JO - Ophthalmology Retina
JF - Ophthalmology Retina
IS - 9
ER -