TY - JOUR
T1 - Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
T2 - A Hemodynamic Analysis of the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) Trial and Registry
AU - Lala, Anuradha
AU - Guo, Yu
AU - Xu, Jinfeng
AU - Esposito, Michele
AU - Morine, Kevin
AU - Karas, Richard
AU - Katz, Stuart D.
AU - Hochman, Judith S.
AU - Burkhoff, Daniel
AU - Kapur, Navin K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Background: The prevalence and significance of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) have not been well characterized. We hypothesized that RVD is common in AMI-CS and associated with worse clinical outcomes. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed patients with available hemodynamics enrolled in the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial (n = 139) and registry (n = 258) to identify RVD in AMI-CS. RVD was defined by an elevated central venous pressure (CVP), elevated CVP–pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ratio, decreased pulmonary artery pulsatility index, and decreased right ventricular stroke work index. A P value of <.01 was used to infer significance. In the SHOCK trial and registry, respectively, 38% and 37% of patients had RVD, but RVD was not associated with 30-day or 6-month survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.51, (99% CI 0.92–2.49; P =.10). RV failure with the use of inclusion criteria from the Recover Right Trial for RV Failure (RR-RVF) requiring percutaneous mechanical circulatory support included elevated CVP and CVP/PCWP and a low cardiac index despite ≥1 inotrope or vasopressor. In the SHOCK trial and registry, respectively, 45% (n = 63/139) and 38% (n = 98/258) of patients met RR-RVF criteria. The RR-RVF criteria were not significantly associated with 30-day mortality in the registry cohort (HR 1.44, 99% CI 1.01–2.04; P =.04), or in the trial cohort (HR 1.51, 99% CI 0.92–2.49; P =.10). Conclusions: Hemodynamically defined RVD is common in AMI-CS. Routine assessment with pulmonary artery catherization allows detection of RVD; however, further work is needed to identify interventions that will result in improved outcomes for these patients.
AB - Background: The prevalence and significance of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) have not been well characterized. We hypothesized that RVD is common in AMI-CS and associated with worse clinical outcomes. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed patients with available hemodynamics enrolled in the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial (n = 139) and registry (n = 258) to identify RVD in AMI-CS. RVD was defined by an elevated central venous pressure (CVP), elevated CVP–pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ratio, decreased pulmonary artery pulsatility index, and decreased right ventricular stroke work index. A P value of <.01 was used to infer significance. In the SHOCK trial and registry, respectively, 38% and 37% of patients had RVD, but RVD was not associated with 30-day or 6-month survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.51, (99% CI 0.92–2.49; P =.10). RV failure with the use of inclusion criteria from the Recover Right Trial for RV Failure (RR-RVF) requiring percutaneous mechanical circulatory support included elevated CVP and CVP/PCWP and a low cardiac index despite ≥1 inotrope or vasopressor. In the SHOCK trial and registry, respectively, 45% (n = 63/139) and 38% (n = 98/258) of patients met RR-RVF criteria. The RR-RVF criteria were not significantly associated with 30-day mortality in the registry cohort (HR 1.44, 99% CI 1.01–2.04; P =.04), or in the trial cohort (HR 1.51, 99% CI 0.92–2.49; P =.10). Conclusions: Hemodynamically defined RVD is common in AMI-CS. Routine assessment with pulmonary artery catherization allows detection of RVD; however, further work is needed to identify interventions that will result in improved outcomes for these patients.
KW - acute myocardial infarction
KW - cardiogenic shock
KW - hemodynamics
KW - right ventricular dysfunction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035081127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.10.009
DO - 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.10.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 29032225
AN - SCOPUS:85035081127
SN - 1071-9164
VL - 24
SP - 148
EP - 156
JO - Journal of Cardiac Failure
JF - Journal of Cardiac Failure
IS - 3
ER -