Retraction: Efficacy of intensive radiofrequency energy delivery to the localized dense scar area in post-infarction ventricular tachycardia ablation: A comparative study with standard strategy targeting the infarcted border zone (Circulation Journal (2017) 81:11 (1603-1610) DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0306)

  • Kenji Kuroki

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Dear Editor in Chief, Circulation Journal We'd like to retract our manuscript published in your journal (Kuroki K, Nogami A, Yoshida K, Goya M, Fukunaga M, Kaitani K, Onishi N, Mine T, Koyama T, Igawa M, Machino T, Yamasaki H, Xu D, Igarashi M, Murakoshi N, Sekiguchi Y, Aonuma K. Efficacy of Intensive Radiofrequency Energy Delivery to the Localized Dense Scar Area in Post-Infarction Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: A Comparative Study With Standard Strategy Targeting the Infarcted Border Zone. Circ J 2017; 81(11): 1603 - 1610). We apologize that we have not obtained the approval of Institutional Review Board for this study. This request of retraction was agreed by all authors of this paper. We are deeply sorry for any inconvenience this has caused.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1198
Number of pages1
JournalCirculation Journal
Volume84
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 25 Jun 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Retraction: Efficacy of intensive radiofrequency energy delivery to the localized dense scar area in post-infarction ventricular tachycardia ablation: A comparative study with standard strategy targeting the infarcted border zone (Circulation Journal (2017) 81:11 (1603-1610) DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0306)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this