Abstract

We appreciate the comments of Gilman et al. (2023) on our paper and their acknowledgement of its importance in highlighting the significance of this area of research. Further, their acknowledgment that the primary results of our study are in a range that is similar to those from other published studies of children exposed to highly stressful environmental events emphasizes the validity of our findings and the important extension of our results to children experiencing these events in utero. They, however, raised concerns about some of the results regarding specific types of psychiatric disorders and sex-specific results related to the prenatal Superstorm Sandy hurricane exposure. We comment on the various issues related to the paper below but will not respond to comments regarding the press coverage of this article, which we think are beyond the scope of this commentary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)989-990
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines
Volume65
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response to uncertainty in developmental origins of health and disease research: commentary on Nomura et al. (2022)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this