Response to letter to the editor regarding “Does the 5-2-1 criteria identify patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease? Real-world screening accuracy and burden of 5-2-1-positive patients in 7 countries”

Angelo Antonini, K. Ray Chaudhuri, Josefa Domingos, Joohi Jimenez-Shahed, Jack Wright, Connie H. Yan, Ali Alobaidi, Lars Bergmann, Koray Onuk, Linda Harmer, Irene A. Malaty

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

The 5-2-1 criteria was developed to facilitate the identification and referral of patients with Parkinson’s Disease (PD) inadequately controlled by oral medications. The criterion was not developed to screen patients with PD for device-aided therapy eligibility. The robust design and validation of the 5-2-1 criteria minimizes over or inappropriate referrals, and supports physicians in the timely identification of patients with PD who may warrant further evaluation for treatment optimization. This response letter clarifies concerns raised by Moes et al.

Original languageEnglish
Article number266
JournalBMC Neurology
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • 5-2-1 criteria
  • Advanced Parkinson’s disease
  • Device-aided therapies
  • Patient identification
  • Screening performance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response to letter to the editor regarding “Does the 5-2-1 criteria identify patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease? Real-world screening accuracy and burden of 5-2-1-positive patients in 7 countries”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this