TY - JOUR
T1 - Respiratory drive and pattern during inertially-loaded CO2 rebreathing
T2 - implications for models of respiratory mechanics in obesity
AU - Brown, Lee K.
AU - Schwartz, Joseph
AU - Miller, Albert
AU - Pilipski, Mark
AU - Teirstein, Alvin S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements. We gratefully acknowledge the secretarial assistance of Charlene Toombs and Sarah Lyon. Grant support was provided by the Catherine and Henry Gaisman Foundation.
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - Chest wall inertance (Iw) constitutes a mechanical load which is small in normal individuals, but increases in the morbidly obese. The effect of increased Iw on respiratory drive and pattern has not previously been investigated. We studied this effect by measuring rebreathing CO2 response in 10 normal subjects with and without a 45.5 kg inertial load. Changes in inspiratory occlusion pressure (P0.1), ventilation, respiratory rate, mean inspiratory flow (Vt Ti) duty cycle (Ti Tt), inspiratory and expiratory times, and [P0.1/(Vt Ti)] were assessed. The P0.1 vs. PetCO2 response shifted to the left during inertial loading, while the slope remained unchanged (x-intercept = 36.7 ± 4.9 mm Hg unloaded vs. 32.7 ± 7.5 mm Hg loaded, P < 0.05), increasing P0.1 from 18.5 ± 8.0 to 21.0 ± 7.6 cm H2O at PetCO2 = 65 mm Hg (P < 0.005). Respiratory pattern was unchanged with the inertial load except for a slight decrease in tidal volume. The inspiratory transfer characteristic [P0.1/(Vt Ti] at PetCO2 = 65 mm Hg increased significantly (8.3 ± 2.0 to 10.5 ± 2.9 cm H2O·(L·sec-1)-1, P < 0.025) illustrating the strategy of maintaining similar ventilation by increasing inspiratory force against the load.
AB - Chest wall inertance (Iw) constitutes a mechanical load which is small in normal individuals, but increases in the morbidly obese. The effect of increased Iw on respiratory drive and pattern has not previously been investigated. We studied this effect by measuring rebreathing CO2 response in 10 normal subjects with and without a 45.5 kg inertial load. Changes in inspiratory occlusion pressure (P0.1), ventilation, respiratory rate, mean inspiratory flow (Vt Ti) duty cycle (Ti Tt), inspiratory and expiratory times, and [P0.1/(Vt Ti)] were assessed. The P0.1 vs. PetCO2 response shifted to the left during inertial loading, while the slope remained unchanged (x-intercept = 36.7 ± 4.9 mm Hg unloaded vs. 32.7 ± 7.5 mm Hg loaded, P < 0.05), increasing P0.1 from 18.5 ± 8.0 to 21.0 ± 7.6 cm H2O at PetCO2 = 65 mm Hg (P < 0.005). Respiratory pattern was unchanged with the inertial load except for a slight decrease in tidal volume. The inspiratory transfer characteristic [P0.1/(Vt Ti] at PetCO2 = 65 mm Hg increased significantly (8.3 ± 2.0 to 10.5 ± 2.9 cm H2O·(L·sec-1)-1, P < 0.025) illustrating the strategy of maintaining similar ventilation by increasing inspiratory force against the load.
KW - Animal
KW - Control of breathing
KW - Mechanics of breathing
KW - Obesity
KW - Occlusion pressure
KW - Pattern of breathing, chest wall inertance
KW - Rrebreathing
KW - chest wall inertance
KW - man
KW - obesity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025335349&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0034-5687(90)90086-E
DO - 10.1016/0034-5687(90)90086-E
M3 - Article
C2 - 2120752
AN - SCOPUS:0025335349
SN - 0034-5687
VL - 80
SP - 231
EP - 243
JO - Respiration Physiology
JF - Respiration Physiology
IS - 2-3
ER -