Resolving alliance ruptures from an attachment-informed perspective

Madeleine Miller-Bottome, Alessandro Talia, Jeremy D. Safran, J. Christopher Muran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, we examine how the different attachment patterns enable or hinder the resolution of ruptures in the therapeutic alliance. We try to show that secure and insecure patients alike may experience ruptures in the therapeutic alliance, but that their ability to participate in resolving such ruptures differ markedly. Recent findings with the Patient Attachment Coding System (PACS) show that attachment classifications manifest in psychotherapy as distinct ways of communicating about present internal experience. Secure patients disclose their present experience openly and invite attunement from the therapist, while insecure patients either minimize their contributions to the dialogue (avoidant) or the contributions of the therapist (preoccupied). Using examples from session transcripts, we demonstrate how secure patients are particularly responsive to resolution strategies that focus on here-and-now experience, while insecure patients' characteristic ways of communicating pose significant challenges to the resolution process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-183
Number of pages9
JournalPsychoanalytic Psychology
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adult Attachment Interview
  • Attachment patterns
  • Client variables
  • Psychodynamic psychotherapy
  • Psychotherapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resolving alliance ruptures from an attachment-informed perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this