Resistance to Change

Mark I. Evans, David W. Britt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Advances in medical technology do not follow a smooth process and are highly variable. Implementation can occasionally be rapid, but often faces varying degrees of resistance resulting at the very least in delayed implementation. Using qualitative comparative analysis, we have evaluated numerous technological advances from the perspective of how they were introduced, implemented, and opposed. Resistance varies from benign — often happening because of inertia or lack of resources to more active forms, including outright opposition using both appropriate and inappropriate methods to resist/delay changes in care. Today, even public health has become politicized, having nothing to do with the underlying science, but having catastrophic results. Two other corroding influences are marketing pressure from the private sector and vested interests in favor of one outcome or another. This also applies to governmental agencies. There are a number of ways in which papers have been buried including putting the thumb on the scale where reviewers can sabotage new ideas. Unless we learn to harness new technologies earlier in their life course and understand how to maneuver around the pillars of obstruction to their implementation, we will not be able to provide medical care at the forefront of technological capabilities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)835-853
Number of pages19
JournalReproductive Sciences
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Keywords

  • Conflicts of interest
  • Editorial process
  • Peer review
  • Resistance to change
  • Technology advancement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resistance to Change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this