Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Resection of craniopharyngiomas: comparison between gross total resection and subtotal resection with adjuvant radiation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas (CPs) remains a challenge, with significant variability in the literature. Methods: we therefore analyze current studies to demonstrate how the field has changed over the years. Results: Achieving a gross total resection for these histologically benign lesions often poses significant difficulty based on their proximity, adherence, or invasion of adjacent critically important neuronal and vascular structures. In our historical literature, gross-total resection from transcranial surgery often carried high morbidity leading some to advocate for subtotal resection paired with postoperative radiotherapy as a preferable strategy. The advent of the extended endonasal endoscopic approach has led to a reconsideration of this tactic. Conclusions: In this review, we discuss several of the studies that led to the current understanding of surgical options for craniopharyngiomas and discuss how the endonasal approach and more recent published results may modify surgical thinking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)495-503
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neuro-Oncology
Volume173
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Craniopharyngiomas
  • Endoscopy
  • Gross-total resection
  • Hypopituitarism
  • Radiation
  • Subtotal resection
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resection of craniopharyngiomas: comparison between gross total resection and subtotal resection with adjuvant radiation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this