Relation of final lumen dimensions in saphenous vein grafts after stent implantation to outcome

Ioannis Iakovou, George Dangas, Gary S. Mintz, Roxana Mehran, Yoshio Kobayashi, Eve D. Aymong, Makoto Hirose, Dale T. Ashby, Alexandra J. Lansky, Gregg W. Stone, Martin B. Leon, Jeffrey W. Moses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Larger final lumen dimensions after percutaneous coronary interventions in native coronary arteries lead to lower restenosis rates. We sought to determine the impact of stent expansion, as assessed by intravascular ultrasound, on clinical results of stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). We identified 226 consecutive patients who underwent intravascular ultrasound-guided stenting of 234 de novo SVG lesions. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the final stent cross-sectional area (CSA): group I (stent CSA <100% of the reference lumen CSA, n = 176 patients, 182 lesions) and group II (stent CSA ≥100% of the reference lumen CSA, n = 50 patients, 52 lesions). Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups with the exception of smaller lesions in group II. More aggressive stent expansion (group II) was associated with (1) increased rates of in-hospital non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (29% vs 17%, p = 0.05), (2) any myocardial infarction (26% vs 8%, p = 0.003) at 1-year follow-up, and (3) no improvement in target vessel revascularization at 1 year (31% vs 26%, p = 0.3). Aggressive stent expansion in SVG lesions resulted in higher myocardial infarction rates and, unlike native arteries, no improvement in target vessel revascularization rate at 1 year. A less aggressive stent implantation strategy in SVGs than in native coronary lesions appears prudent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)963-968
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume93
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Apr 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relation of final lumen dimensions in saphenous vein grafts after stent implantation to outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this