TY - JOUR
T1 - Regulation of medical student work hours
T2 - A national survey of deans
AU - Friedman, Erica
AU - Karani, Reena
AU - Fallar, Robert
PY - 2011/1
Y1 - 2011/1
N2 - Purpose: Because of the impact of resident duty hours on resident and medical student education, it is important to determine curriculum deans' opinions toward and current status of student work hours regulations. Method: In 2008, the authors electronically surveyed the curriculum deans at the 126 U.S. medical schools accredited by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) regarding student work hours at their schools. Results: Sixty-six respondents (82%) had a written policy restricting their students' work hours, and in 63% of these, the policy also extended to students visiting their institution. Policies applied to mandatory and elective (84%) or only mandatory (16%) rotations. About half the respondents supported a universal policy across medical schools, but of those who supported a policy, there was an equal split between whether individual schools or the LCME should create the policy. Deans felt strongly (>80%) that student well-being would be improved by work hours regulation, yet 48% noted that it would negatively affect scheduling required clerkship activities. Fifty-four percent supported the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work hours policy for students, and most (82%) felt that students should work no more than 80 hours/week. Students are always supervised, yet extended work hours can affect learning and patient and team interactions. Conclusions: Without a mandate, many schools have created policies to restrict student work hours. This study describes the current status and offers an opportunity for consensus building around this important issue.
AB - Purpose: Because of the impact of resident duty hours on resident and medical student education, it is important to determine curriculum deans' opinions toward and current status of student work hours regulations. Method: In 2008, the authors electronically surveyed the curriculum deans at the 126 U.S. medical schools accredited by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) regarding student work hours at their schools. Results: Sixty-six respondents (82%) had a written policy restricting their students' work hours, and in 63% of these, the policy also extended to students visiting their institution. Policies applied to mandatory and elective (84%) or only mandatory (16%) rotations. About half the respondents supported a universal policy across medical schools, but of those who supported a policy, there was an equal split between whether individual schools or the LCME should create the policy. Deans felt strongly (>80%) that student well-being would be improved by work hours regulation, yet 48% noted that it would negatively affect scheduling required clerkship activities. Fifty-four percent supported the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work hours policy for students, and most (82%) felt that students should work no more than 80 hours/week. Students are always supervised, yet extended work hours can affect learning and patient and team interactions. Conclusions: Without a mandate, many schools have created policies to restrict student work hours. This study describes the current status and offers an opportunity for consensus building around this important issue.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751591530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ff9725
DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ff9725
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:78751591530
SN - 1040-2446
VL - 86
SP - 30
EP - 33
JO - Academic Medicine
JF - Academic Medicine
IS - 1
ER -