TY - JOUR
T1 - Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID)
T2 - Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements
AU - Jones, W. Schuyler
AU - Krucoff, Mitchell W.
AU - Morales, Pablo
AU - Wilgus, Rebecca W.
AU - Heath, Anne H.
AU - Williams, Mary F.
AU - Tcheng, James E.
AU - Marinac-Dabic, J. Danica
AU - Malone, Misti L.
AU - Reed, Terrie L.
AU - Fukaya, Rie
AU - Lookstein, Robert A.
AU - Handa, Nobuhiro
AU - Aronow, Herbert D.
AU - Bertges, Daniel J.
AU - Jaff, Michael R.
AU - Tsai, Thomas T.
AU - Smale, Joshua A.
AU - Zaugg, Margo J.
AU - Thatcher, Robert J.
AU - Cronenwett, Jack L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Conception and design: WJ, MK, PM, RW, AH, MW, JT, JMD, MM, TR, RF, RL, NH, HA, DB, MJ, TT, JS, MZ, RT, JC Analysis and interpretation: WJ, MK, PM, RW, AH, MW, JT, JMD, MM, TR, RF, RL, NH, HA, DB, MJ, TT, JS, MZ, RT, JC Data collection: WJ, MK, PM, RW, AH, MW, JT, JMD, MM, TR, RF, RL, NH, HA, DB, MJ, TT, JS, MZ, RT, JC Writing the article: WJ, MK, PM, RW, AH, MW, JT, JMD, MM, TR, RF, RL, NH, HA, DB, MJ, TT, JS, MZ, RT, JC Critical revision of the article: WJ, MK, PM, RW, AH, MW, JT, JMD, MM, TR, RF, RL, NH, HA, DB, MJ, TT, JS, MZ, RT, JC Final approval of the article: WJ, MK, PM, RW, AH, MW, JT, JMD, MM, TR, RF, RL, NH, HA, DB, MJ, TT, JS, MZ, RT, JC Statistical analysis: Not applicable Obtained funding: WJ, MK, PM, RW, RT, JC Overall responsibility: WJ Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID) working group members included representatives from academic research groups from the United States, Japan, and Europe; representatives from vascular medicine, vascular surgery, interventional radiology, and cardiology; industry representatives; the U.S. Food and Drug Administration; and the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency regulatory authorities from Japan. Appendix (online only) Appendix Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery and the Japanese Circulation Society
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Objective: The current state of evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease and more specifically of evaluating medical devices used for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the disease process, the multiple physician specialties that perform PVI, the multitude of devices available to treat peripheral artery disease, and the lack of consensus about the best treatment approaches. Because PVI core data elements are not standardized across clinical care, clinical trials, and registries, aggregation of data across different data sources and physician specialties is currently not feasible. Methods: Under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Medical Device Epidemiology Network initiative—and its PASSION (Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of the National Registries) program, in conjunction with other efforts to align clinical data standards—the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID) workgroup was convened. RAPID is a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort to develop a consensus lexicon and to promote interoperability across clinical care, clinical trials, and national and international registries of PVI. Results: The current manuscript presents the initial work from RAPID to standardize clinical data elements and definitions, to establish a framework within electronic health records and health information technology procedural reporting systems, and to implement an informatics-based approach to promote the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials and registry efforts in PVI. Conclusions: Ultimately, we hope this work will facilitate and improve device evaluation and surveillance for patients, clinicians, health outcomes researchers, industry, policymakers, and regulators.
AB - Objective: The current state of evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease and more specifically of evaluating medical devices used for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the disease process, the multiple physician specialties that perform PVI, the multitude of devices available to treat peripheral artery disease, and the lack of consensus about the best treatment approaches. Because PVI core data elements are not standardized across clinical care, clinical trials, and registries, aggregation of data across different data sources and physician specialties is currently not feasible. Methods: Under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Medical Device Epidemiology Network initiative—and its PASSION (Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of the National Registries) program, in conjunction with other efforts to align clinical data standards—the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID) workgroup was convened. RAPID is a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort to develop a consensus lexicon and to promote interoperability across clinical care, clinical trials, and national and international registries of PVI. Results: The current manuscript presents the initial work from RAPID to standardize clinical data elements and definitions, to establish a framework within electronic health records and health information technology procedural reporting systems, and to implement an informatics-based approach to promote the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials and registry efforts in PVI. Conclusions: Ultimately, we hope this work will facilitate and improve device evaluation and surveillance for patients, clinicians, health outcomes researchers, industry, policymakers, and regulators.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041317269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.141
DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.141
M3 - Article
C2 - 29389426
AN - SCOPUS:85041317269
SN - 0741-5214
VL - 67
SP - 637-644.e30
JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery
IS - 2
ER -