TY - JOUR
T1 - Reflection on modern methods
T2 - good practices for applied statistical learning in epidemiology
AU - Nunez, Yanelli
AU - Gibson, Elizabeth A.
AU - Tanner, Eva M.
AU - Gennings, Chris
AU - Coull, Brent A.
AU - Goldsmith, Jeff
AU - Kioumourtzoglou, Marianthi Anna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
VC The Author(s) 2021; all rights reserved.
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - Statistical learning includes methods that extract knowledge from complex data. Statistical learning methods beyond generalized linear models, such as shrinkage methods or kernel smoothing methods, are being increasingly implemented in public health research and epidemiology because they can perform better in instances with complex or high-dimensional data—settings in which traditional statistical methods fail. These novel methods, however, often include random sampling which may induce variability in results. Best practices in data science can help to ensure robustness. As a case study, we included four statistical learning models that have been applied previously to analyze the relationship between environmental mixtures and health outcomes. We ran each model across 100 initializing values for random number generation, or ‘seeds’, and assessed variability in resulting estimation and inference. All methods exhibited some seed-dependent variability in results. The degree of variability differed across methods and exposure of interest. Any statistical learning method reliant on a random seed will exhibit some degree of seed sensitivity. We recommend that researchers repeat their analysis with various seeds as a sensitivity analysis when implementing these methods to enhance interpretability and robustness of results.
AB - Statistical learning includes methods that extract knowledge from complex data. Statistical learning methods beyond generalized linear models, such as shrinkage methods or kernel smoothing methods, are being increasingly implemented in public health research and epidemiology because they can perform better in instances with complex or high-dimensional data—settings in which traditional statistical methods fail. These novel methods, however, often include random sampling which may induce variability in results. Best practices in data science can help to ensure robustness. As a case study, we included four statistical learning models that have been applied previously to analyze the relationship between environmental mixtures and health outcomes. We ran each model across 100 initializing values for random number generation, or ‘seeds’, and assessed variability in resulting estimation and inference. All methods exhibited some seed-dependent variability in results. The degree of variability differed across methods and exposure of interest. Any statistical learning method reliant on a random seed will exhibit some degree of seed sensitivity. We recommend that researchers repeat their analysis with various seeds as a sensitivity analysis when implementing these methods to enhance interpretability and robustness of results.
KW - Bayesian statistics
KW - Statistical learning
KW - environmental mixtures
KW - machine learning
KW - penalized regression
KW - random seed
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106614230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ije/dyaa259
DO - 10.1093/ije/dyaa259
M3 - Article
C2 - 34000733
AN - SCOPUS:85106614230
SN - 0300-5771
VL - 50
SP - 685
EP - 693
JO - International Journal of Epidemiology
JF - International Journal of Epidemiology
IS - 2
ER -