TY - JOUR
T1 - Reexamining “psychosocial clearance”
T2 - A procedural framework for psychosocial evaluation in liver transplantation
AU - Winder, Gerald Scott
AU - Fernandez, Anne C.
AU - Perumalswami, Ponni V.
AU - Mellinger, Jessica L.
AU - Clifton, Erin G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Psychosocial and “nonmedical” phenomena are commonly encountered in liver transplantation (LT) evaluations. They are simultaneously crucial decision-making factors and some of the most difficult and controversial clinical matters clinicians confront. Epidemiology, societal trends, and the preponderance of psychological and behavioral factors underpinning common end-stage liver diseases ensure that LT teams will continue to encounter highly complex psychosocial patient presentations. Psychosocial policies, practices, and opinions vary widely among clinicians and LT centers. Liver clinicians already report insufficient psychosocial expertise, which creates a large gap between the stark need for psychosocial expansion, improvement, and innovation in LT and the lack of accompanying guidance on how to achieve it. While the clinical domains of an LT psychosocial evaluation have been well-described, few articles analyze the procedures by which teams determine candidates’ “psychosocial clearance” and no conceptual frameworks exist. This article proposes a framework of core domains of psychosocial evaluation procedures, common pitfalls, and practical improvement strategies.
AB - Psychosocial and “nonmedical” phenomena are commonly encountered in liver transplantation (LT) evaluations. They are simultaneously crucial decision-making factors and some of the most difficult and controversial clinical matters clinicians confront. Epidemiology, societal trends, and the preponderance of psychological and behavioral factors underpinning common end-stage liver diseases ensure that LT teams will continue to encounter highly complex psychosocial patient presentations. Psychosocial policies, practices, and opinions vary widely among clinicians and LT centers. Liver clinicians already report insufficient psychosocial expertise, which creates a large gap between the stark need for psychosocial expansion, improvement, and innovation in LT and the lack of accompanying guidance on how to achieve it. While the clinical domains of an LT psychosocial evaluation have been well-described, few articles analyze the procedures by which teams determine candidates’ “psychosocial clearance” and no conceptual frameworks exist. This article proposes a framework of core domains of psychosocial evaluation procedures, common pitfalls, and practical improvement strategies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187963249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000306
DO - 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000306
M3 - Article
C2 - 38009890
AN - SCOPUS:85187963249
SN - 1527-6465
VL - 30
SP - 431
EP - 442
JO - Liver Transplantation
JF - Liver Transplantation
IS - 4
ER -