TY - JOUR
T1 - Reducing Inappropriate Simultaneous Ordering of Heparin Antibody and Serotonin Release Assays
AU - Talledo, Joseph
AU - Cho, Hyung J.
AU - Alaiev, Daniel
AU - Israilov, Sigal
AU - Chandra, Komal
AU - Zaurova, Milana
AU - Manchego, Peter Alacron
AU - Shin, Dawi
AU - Tsega, Surafel
AU - Krouss, Mona
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Joint Commission
PY - 2023/6/1
Y1 - 2023/6/1
N2 - Introduction: A 4T score with intermediate or high probability of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prompts ordering of anti-platelet 4 heparin complex. If positive, a serotonin release assay (SRA) is recommended to confirm diagnosis. Despite these recommendations, overtesting of both anti-platelet 4 and SRA is highly prevalent. Methods: This was a quality improvement initiative using two forms of clinical decision support across 11 acute care hospitals. First, a 4T calculator was incorporated into anti-platelet 4 orders. Second, a Best Practice Advisory fired when anti-platelet 4 and SRA were ordered simultaneously, prompting the provider to remove the SRA order. Data were analyzed by a quasi-experimental interrupted time series linear regression comparing weekly average laboratory tests per 1,000 patient-days pre- and postintervention. Results: Average ordering frequency of anti-platelet 4 changed from 0.508 to 0.510 per 1,000 patient-days (0.5%, p = 0.42) without significant slope or level differences. Average ordering frequency of SRA decreased from 0.430 to 0.289 per 1,000 patient-days (32.8%, p < 0.001) with a significant level difference of -0.128 orders per 1,000 patient-days (-31.2%, p < 0.05). Conclusion: A simultaneous Best Practice Advisory was effective in reducing SRA orders, but not anti-platelet 4 orders.
AB - Introduction: A 4T score with intermediate or high probability of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prompts ordering of anti-platelet 4 heparin complex. If positive, a serotonin release assay (SRA) is recommended to confirm diagnosis. Despite these recommendations, overtesting of both anti-platelet 4 and SRA is highly prevalent. Methods: This was a quality improvement initiative using two forms of clinical decision support across 11 acute care hospitals. First, a 4T calculator was incorporated into anti-platelet 4 orders. Second, a Best Practice Advisory fired when anti-platelet 4 and SRA were ordered simultaneously, prompting the provider to remove the SRA order. Data were analyzed by a quasi-experimental interrupted time series linear regression comparing weekly average laboratory tests per 1,000 patient-days pre- and postintervention. Results: Average ordering frequency of anti-platelet 4 changed from 0.508 to 0.510 per 1,000 patient-days (0.5%, p = 0.42) without significant slope or level differences. Average ordering frequency of SRA decreased from 0.430 to 0.289 per 1,000 patient-days (32.8%, p < 0.001) with a significant level difference of -0.128 orders per 1,000 patient-days (-31.2%, p < 0.05). Conclusion: A simultaneous Best Practice Advisory was effective in reducing SRA orders, but not anti-platelet 4 orders.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85154046248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.03.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.03.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85154046248
SN - 1553-7250
VL - 49
SP - 306
EP - 312
JO - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
JF - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
IS - 6-7
ER -