TY - JOUR
T1 - Reduced Rivaroxaban Dose Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Left Atrial Appendage Closure
T2 - ADRIFT a Randomized Pilot Study
AU - Duthoit, Guillaume
AU - Silvain, Johanne
AU - Marijon, Eloi
AU - Ducrocq, Grégory
AU - Lepillier, Antoine
AU - Frere, Corinne
AU - Dimby, Solohaja Faniaha
AU - Popovic, Batric
AU - Lellouche, Nicolas
AU - Martin-Toutain, Isabelle
AU - Spaulding, Christian
AU - Brochet, Eric
AU - Attias, David
AU - Mansourati, Jacques
AU - Lorgis, Luc
AU - Klug, Didier
AU - Zannad, Noura
AU - Hauguel-Moreau, Marie
AU - Braik, Nassim
AU - Deltour, Sandrine
AU - Ceccaldi, Alexandre
AU - Wang, Hui
AU - Hammoudi, Nadjib
AU - Brugier, Delphine
AU - Vicaut, Eric
AU - Juliard, Jean Michel
AU - Montalescot, Gilles
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) exposes to the risk of device thrombosis in patients with atrial fibrillation who frequently have a contraindication to full anticoagulation. Thereby, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is usually preferred. No randomized study has evaluated nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant after LAAC, and we decided to evaluate the efficacy and safety of reduced doses of rivaroxaban after LAAC. Methods: ADRIFT (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Rivaroxaban in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Left Atrial Appendage Closure) is a multicenter, phase IIb study, which randomized 105 patients after successful LAAC to either rivaroxaban 10 mg (R10, n=37), rivaroxaban 15 mg (R15, n=35), or DAPT with aspirin 75 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg (n=33). The primary end point was thrombin generation (prothrombin fragments 1+2) measured 2 to 4 hours after drug intake, 10 days after treatment initiation. Thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimers, rivaroxaban concentrations were also measured at 10 days and 3 months. Clinical end points were evaluated at 3-month follow-up. Results: The primary end point was reduced with R10(179 pmol/L [interquartile range (IQR), 129-273], P<0.0001) and R15(163 pmol/L [IQR, 112-231], P<0.0001) as compared with DAPT (322 pmol/L [IQR, 218-528]). We observed no significant reduction of the primary end point between R10and R15while rivaroxaban concentrations increased significantly from 184 ng/mL (IQR, 127-290) with R10to 274 ng/mL (IQR, 192-377) with R15, P<0.0001. Thrombin-antithrombin complex and D-dimers were numerically lower with both rivaroxaban doses than with DAPT. These findings were all confirmed at 3 months. The clinical end points were not different between groups. A device thrombosis was noted in 2 patients assigned to DAPT. Conclusions: Thrombin generation measured after LAAC was lower in patients treated by reduced rivaroxaban doses than DAPT, supporting an alternative to the antithrombotic regimens currently used after LAAC and deserves further evaluation in larger studies.
AB - Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) exposes to the risk of device thrombosis in patients with atrial fibrillation who frequently have a contraindication to full anticoagulation. Thereby, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is usually preferred. No randomized study has evaluated nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant after LAAC, and we decided to evaluate the efficacy and safety of reduced doses of rivaroxaban after LAAC. Methods: ADRIFT (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Rivaroxaban in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Left Atrial Appendage Closure) is a multicenter, phase IIb study, which randomized 105 patients after successful LAAC to either rivaroxaban 10 mg (R10, n=37), rivaroxaban 15 mg (R15, n=35), or DAPT with aspirin 75 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg (n=33). The primary end point was thrombin generation (prothrombin fragments 1+2) measured 2 to 4 hours after drug intake, 10 days after treatment initiation. Thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimers, rivaroxaban concentrations were also measured at 10 days and 3 months. Clinical end points were evaluated at 3-month follow-up. Results: The primary end point was reduced with R10(179 pmol/L [interquartile range (IQR), 129-273], P<0.0001) and R15(163 pmol/L [IQR, 112-231], P<0.0001) as compared with DAPT (322 pmol/L [IQR, 218-528]). We observed no significant reduction of the primary end point between R10and R15while rivaroxaban concentrations increased significantly from 184 ng/mL (IQR, 127-290) with R10to 274 ng/mL (IQR, 192-377) with R15, P<0.0001. Thrombin-antithrombin complex and D-dimers were numerically lower with both rivaroxaban doses than with DAPT. These findings were all confirmed at 3 months. The clinical end points were not different between groups. A device thrombosis was noted in 2 patients assigned to DAPT. Conclusions: Thrombin generation measured after LAAC was lower in patients treated by reduced rivaroxaban doses than DAPT, supporting an alternative to the antithrombotic regimens currently used after LAAC and deserves further evaluation in larger studies.
KW - atrial appendage
KW - atrial fibrillation
KW - clopidogrel
KW - rivaroxaban
KW - thrombin
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85088155765
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008481
DO - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008481
M3 - Article
C2 - 32674675
AN - SCOPUS:85088155765
SN - 1941-7640
VL - 13
JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 7
M1 - e008481
ER -