Redo IPAA for long rectal cuff syndrome after ileoanal pouch for inflammatory bowel disease

Marianna Maspero, David Liska, Hermann Kessler, Jeremy Lipman, Scott R. Steele, Tracy Hull, Taha Qazi, Florian Rieder, Benjamin Cohen, Stefan D. Holubar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: When constructing an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), the rectal cuff should ideally be 1–2 cm long to avoid subsequent complications. Methods: We identified patients from our IBD center who underwent redo IPAA for a long rectal cuff. Long rectal cuff syndrome (LRCS) was defined as a symptomatic rectal cuff ≥ 4 cm. Results: Forty patients met the inclusion criteria: 42.5% female, median age at redo surgery 42.5 years. The presentation was ulcerative proctitis in 77.5% of the cases and outlet obstruction in 22.5%. The index pouch was laparoscopically performed in 18 patients (45%). The median rectal cuff length was 6 cm. The pouch was repaired in 16 (40%) cases, whereas 24 (60%) required the creation of a neo-pouch. At the final pathology, the rectal cuff showed chronic active colitis in 38 (90%) cases. After a median follow-up of 34.5 (IQR 12–109) months, pouch failure occurred in 9 (22.5%) cases. The pouch survival rate was 78% at 3 years. Data on the quality of life were available for 11 (27.5%) patients at a median of 75 months after redo surgery. The median QoL score (0–1) was 0.7 (0.4–0.9). Conclusion: LRCS, a potentially avoidable complication, presents uniformly with symptoms of ulcerative proctitis or stricture. Redo IPAA was restorative for the majority.

Original languageEnglish
Article number38
JournalTechniques in Coloproctology
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Long rectal cuff
  • Redo pouch
  • Salvage surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Redo IPAA for long rectal cuff syndrome after ileoanal pouch for inflammatory bowel disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this