TY - JOUR
T1 - Redefining the Classification for Bertolotti Syndrome
T2 - Anatomical Findings in Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae Guide Treatment Selection
AU - Jenkins, Arthur L.
AU - O'Donnell, John
AU - Chung, Richard J.
AU - Jenkins, Sarah
AU - Hawks, Charlotte
AU - Lazarus, Daniella
AU - McCaffrey, Tara
AU - Terai, Hiromi
AU - Harvie, Camryn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Objective: We present the Jenkins classification for Bertolotti syndrome or symptomatic lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) and compare this with the existing Castellvi classification for patients presenting for treatment. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 150 new patients presenting for treatment of back, hip, groin, and/or leg pain from July 2012 through February 2022. Using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and radiography, the patients with a radiographic finding of LSTV, an appropriate clinical presentation, and identification of LSTV as the primary pain generator via diagnostic injections were diagnosed with Bertolotti syndrome. Patients for whom conservative treatment had failed and who underwent surgery to address their LSTV were included in the present study. Results: The Castellvi classification excludes 2 types of anatomic variants: the prominent anatomic side and the potential transverse process and iliac crest contact. Of 150 patients with transitional anatomy, 103 (69%) were identified with Bertolotti syndrome using the Jenkins classification and received surgery (46 men [45%] and 57 women [55%]). Of the 103 patients, 90 (87%) underwent minimally invasive surgery. The patients presented with pain localized to the back (n = 101; 98%), leg (n = 79; 77%), hip (n = 51; 49%), and buttock (n = 52; 50%). Only 84 of the Jenkins classification patients (82%) met any of the Castellvi criteria. All 19 patients for whom the Castellvi classification failed had had type 1 anatomy using the Jenkins system and underwent surgery (decompression, n = 16 [84%]; fusion, n = 1 [5%]; fusion plus decompression, n = 2 [11%]). Of these 19 patients, 17 (89%) had improved pain scores. The 19 patients exclusively diagnosed via the Jenkins classification had no significant differences in improved pain compared with those diagnosed using the Castellvi classification. Conclusions: The Jenkins classification improves on the prior Castellvi classification to more comprehensively describe the functional anatomy, identify uncaptured anatomy, and better predict optimal surgical procedures to treat those with Bertolotti syndrome.
AB - Objective: We present the Jenkins classification for Bertolotti syndrome or symptomatic lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) and compare this with the existing Castellvi classification for patients presenting for treatment. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 150 new patients presenting for treatment of back, hip, groin, and/or leg pain from July 2012 through February 2022. Using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and radiography, the patients with a radiographic finding of LSTV, an appropriate clinical presentation, and identification of LSTV as the primary pain generator via diagnostic injections were diagnosed with Bertolotti syndrome. Patients for whom conservative treatment had failed and who underwent surgery to address their LSTV were included in the present study. Results: The Castellvi classification excludes 2 types of anatomic variants: the prominent anatomic side and the potential transverse process and iliac crest contact. Of 150 patients with transitional anatomy, 103 (69%) were identified with Bertolotti syndrome using the Jenkins classification and received surgery (46 men [45%] and 57 women [55%]). Of the 103 patients, 90 (87%) underwent minimally invasive surgery. The patients presented with pain localized to the back (n = 101; 98%), leg (n = 79; 77%), hip (n = 51; 49%), and buttock (n = 52; 50%). Only 84 of the Jenkins classification patients (82%) met any of the Castellvi criteria. All 19 patients for whom the Castellvi classification failed had had type 1 anatomy using the Jenkins system and underwent surgery (decompression, n = 16 [84%]; fusion, n = 1 [5%]; fusion plus decompression, n = 2 [11%]). Of these 19 patients, 17 (89%) had improved pain scores. The 19 patients exclusively diagnosed via the Jenkins classification had no significant differences in improved pain compared with those diagnosed using the Castellvi classification. Conclusions: The Jenkins classification improves on the prior Castellvi classification to more comprehensively describe the functional anatomy, identify uncaptured anatomy, and better predict optimal surgical procedures to treat those with Bertolotti syndrome.
KW - Bertolotti's syndrome
KW - Castellvi classification
KW - Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae
KW - Minimally invasive surgery
KW - Neurosurgery
KW - Spine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152654284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.077
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.077
M3 - Article
C2 - 36965661
AN - SCOPUS:85152654284
SN - 1878-8750
VL - 175
SP - e303-e313
JO - World Neurosurgery
JF - World Neurosurgery
ER -