TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconstruction of urinary andgastrointestinal tracts in total pelvic exenteration
T2 - Experience at columbia-presbyterian medical center
AU - Goluboff, Erik T.
AU - McKiernan, James M.
AU - Todd, George
AU - Nowygrod, Roman
AU - Smith, Daniel
AU - Olsson, Carl A.
PY - 1994/11
Y1 - 1994/11
N2 - Objectives.: To examine the effectiveness of and complications from total pelvic exenteration (TPE) with maintenance of urethral and anal sphincter function for locally invasive tumors of the pelvis. Methods.: A retrospective review of 4 patients who have undergone TPE with urethral and anal sphincter preservation at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center in the last 2 years was performed with attention to perioperative morbidity and mortality, disease-free status, and need for further operative procedures. Results.: Two patients had colorectal adenocarcinoma, 1 had squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, and 1 had prostate sarcoma. All had urinary tract reconstruction with orthotopic neobladder creation, and 3 of 4 had primary low rectal anastomoses for gastrointestinal reconstruction. One patient underwent creation of a J rectal pouch. One of 4 patients had received radiation therapy for the disease prior to surgery. There was no operative or perioperative mortality. Two of 4 patients required reoperation, 1 in the immediate postoperative period for repair of a left ureteral stricture, and the other 13 months postoperatively for repair of a rectal-neobladder fistula. With a mean follow-up of 25 months (range, 21 to 43 months), 3 of 4 patients are alive and free of disease. All living patients are continent of urine and 2 of 3 are continent of stool. Conclusions.: Our experience confirms that TPE can be effective in controlling a varietyof locally advanced pelvic tumors and can be performed in conjunction with simultaneous genitourinary and gastrointestinal reconstruction with minimal morbidity.
AB - Objectives.: To examine the effectiveness of and complications from total pelvic exenteration (TPE) with maintenance of urethral and anal sphincter function for locally invasive tumors of the pelvis. Methods.: A retrospective review of 4 patients who have undergone TPE with urethral and anal sphincter preservation at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center in the last 2 years was performed with attention to perioperative morbidity and mortality, disease-free status, and need for further operative procedures. Results.: Two patients had colorectal adenocarcinoma, 1 had squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, and 1 had prostate sarcoma. All had urinary tract reconstruction with orthotopic neobladder creation, and 3 of 4 had primary low rectal anastomoses for gastrointestinal reconstruction. One patient underwent creation of a J rectal pouch. One of 4 patients had received radiation therapy for the disease prior to surgery. There was no operative or perioperative mortality. Two of 4 patients required reoperation, 1 in the immediate postoperative period for repair of a left ureteral stricture, and the other 13 months postoperatively for repair of a rectal-neobladder fistula. With a mean follow-up of 25 months (range, 21 to 43 months), 3 of 4 patients are alive and free of disease. All living patients are continent of urine and 2 of 3 are continent of stool. Conclusions.: Our experience confirms that TPE can be effective in controlling a varietyof locally advanced pelvic tumors and can be performed in conjunction with simultaneous genitourinary and gastrointestinal reconstruction with minimal morbidity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028674037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0090-4295(94)80201-7
DO - 10.1016/S0090-4295(94)80201-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 7974941
AN - SCOPUS:0028674037
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 44
SP - 666
EP - 670
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
IS - 5
ER -