Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reconceptualising ‘Impact’ through anthropology’s ethnographic practices

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Academic funding bodies are increasingly measuring research impact using accountability and reward assessments. Scholars have argued that frameworks attempting to measure the use-value of knowledge production could end up influencing the selection of research topics, limiting research agendas, and privileging linear over complex research designs. Our article responds to these concerns by calling upon insights from anthropology to reconceptualise impact. We argue that, to conduct socially beneficial studies, impact needs to be turned from a product to an inclusive process of engagement. Anthropology’s epistemologically and methodologically rich tradition of ethnography offers a particularly apposite set of tools to achieve this goal. We present three concrete examples of how we have used ethnography to impact on the work we carry out, particularly in shaping multidisciplinary team-based research approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-13
Number of pages9
JournalAnthropology in Action
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anthropology
  • Ethnography
  • Healthcare
  • Impact
  • Participatory research
  • Process
  • REF2014
  • Reflexivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reconceptualising ‘Impact’ through anthropology’s ethnographic practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this