TY - JOUR
T1 - Recognizing that Evidence is Made, not Born
AU - Lim, Robyn
AU - Lee, David K.
AU - Sabourin, Pierre
AU - Ferguson, John
AU - Metcalf, Marilyn
AU - Smith, Meredith
AU - Corriol-Rohou, Solange
AU - Eichler, Hans Georg
AU - Lumpkin, Murray
AU - Hirsch, Gigi
AU - Chen, Inhua Muijrers
AU - O'Rourke, Brian
AU - Schiel, Anja
AU - Crabb, Nick
AU - Aronson, Naomi
AU - Pezalla, Edmund
AU - Boutin, Marc
AU - Binder, Louise
AU - Wilhelm, Linda
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Health Canada. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - Therapeutic product development, licensing and reimbursement may seem a well-oiled machine, but continuing high attrition rates, regulatory refusals, and patients’ access issues suggest otherwise; despite serious efforts, gaps persist between stakeholders’ stated evidence requirements and actual evidence supplied. Evidentiary deficiencies and/or human tendencies resulting in avoidable inefficiencies might be further reduced with fresh institutional cultures/mindsets, combined with a context-adaptable practices framework that integrates emerging innovations. Here, Structured Evidence Planning, Production, and Evaluation (SEPPE) posits that evidence be treated as something produced, much like other manufactured goods, for which “built-in quality” (i.e., “people” and “process”) approaches have been successfully implemented globally. Incorporating proactive, iterative feedback-and-adjust loops involving key decision-makers at critical points could curtail avoidable evidence quality and decision hazards—pulling needed therapeutic products with high quality evidence of beneficial performance through to approvals. Critical for success, however, is dedicated, long-term commitment to systemic transformation.
AB - Therapeutic product development, licensing and reimbursement may seem a well-oiled machine, but continuing high attrition rates, regulatory refusals, and patients’ access issues suggest otherwise; despite serious efforts, gaps persist between stakeholders’ stated evidence requirements and actual evidence supplied. Evidentiary deficiencies and/or human tendencies resulting in avoidable inefficiencies might be further reduced with fresh institutional cultures/mindsets, combined with a context-adaptable practices framework that integrates emerging innovations. Here, Structured Evidence Planning, Production, and Evaluation (SEPPE) posits that evidence be treated as something produced, much like other manufactured goods, for which “built-in quality” (i.e., “people” and “process”) approaches have been successfully implemented globally. Incorporating proactive, iterative feedback-and-adjust loops involving key decision-makers at critical points could curtail avoidable evidence quality and decision hazards—pulling needed therapeutic products with high quality evidence of beneficial performance through to approvals. Critical for success, however, is dedicated, long-term commitment to systemic transformation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059561210&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cpt.1317
DO - 10.1002/cpt.1317
M3 - Article
C2 - 30472743
AN - SCOPUS:85059561210
SN - 0009-9236
VL - 105
SP - 844
EP - 856
JO - Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
JF - Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
IS - 4
ER -