Real-world evidence of sustained improvement following 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation treatment for pain: a cross-sectional follow-up survey

Matthew J. Pingree, Mark F.B. Hurdle, David A. Spinner, Ali Valimahomed, Nathan D. Crosby, Joseph W. Boggs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: This study presents real-world data from a cross-sectional follow-up survey of patients who previously received 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) treatment for pain. Materials & methods: A survey including validated pain and other related outcome measures was distributed to patients who previously underwent implantation of temporary PNS leads for 60-day PNS treatment. Results: Among survey respondents who were at least 3 months from the start of treatment, most reported sustained clinically significant improvements in pain and/or quality of life, with the length of follow-up at the time of survey completion ranging from 3 to 30 months. Conclusion: These real-world data support recent prospective studies indicating that 60-day percutaneous PNS provides significant and sustained relief across a wide range of pain conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)611-621
Number of pages11
JournalPain Management
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • 60-day PNS
  • chronic pain
  • neurostimulation
  • peripheral nerve stimulation
  • real-world evidence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real-world evidence of sustained improvement following 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation treatment for pain: a cross-sectional follow-up survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this