Rate of correction of hypernatremia and health outcomes in critically ill patients

Kinsuk Chauhan, Pattharawin Pattharanitima, Niralee Patel, Aine Duffy, Aparna Saha, Kumardeep Chaudhary, Neha Debnath, Tielman Van Vleck, Lili Chan, Girish N. Nadkarni, Steven G. Coca

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

76 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and objectives Hypernatremia is common in hospitalized, critically ill patients. Although there are no clear guidelines on sodium correction rate for hypernatremia, some studies suggest a reduction rate not to exceed 0.5 mmol/L per hour. However, the data supporting this recommendation and the optimal rate of hypernatremia correction in hospitalized adults are unclear. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We assessed the association of hypernatremia correction rates with neurologic outcomes and mortality in critically ill patients with hypernatremia at admission and those that developed hypernatremia during hospitalization.We used data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III and identified patients with hypernatremia (serum sodium level >155 mmol/L) on admission (n=122) and hospital-acquired (n=327). We calculated different ranges of rapid correction rates (>0.5 mmol/L perhour overall and >8,>10, and >12 mmol/L per 24 hours) and utilized logistic regression to generate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to examine association with outcomes. Results We had complete data on 122 patients with severe hypernatremia on admission and 327 patients who developed hospital-acquired hypernatremia. The difference in in-hospital 30-day mortality proportion between rapid (>0.5mmol/L per hour) and slower (≤0.5mmol/L per hour) correction rates were not significant either in patients with hypernatremia at admission with rapid versus slow correction (25% versus 28%; P=0.80) or in patientswith hospital-acquired hypernatremiawith rapidversus slowcorrection (44%versus 40%;P=0.50). There was no difference in aOR of mortality for rapid versus slow correction in either admission (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.5 to 3.7) or hospital-acquired hypernatremia (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.3). Manual chart review of all suspected chronic hypernatremia patients, which included all 122 with hypernatremia at admission, 128 of the 327 hospitalacquired hypernatremia, and an additional 28 patients with ICD-9 codes for cerebral edema, seizures and/or alteration of consciousness, did not reveal a single case of cerebral edema attributable to rapid hyprnatremia correction. Conclusions We did not find any evidence that rapid correction of hypernatremia is associated with a higher risk for mortality, seizure, alteration of consciousness, and/or cerebral edema in critically ill adult patients with either admission or hospital-acquired hypernatremia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)656-663
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 7 May 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rate of correction of hypernatremia and health outcomes in critically ill patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this