TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying left ventricular function in heart failure
T2 - What makes a clinically valuable parameter?
AU - Harbo, Markus Borge
AU - Nordén, Einar Sjaastad
AU - Narula, Jagat
AU - Sjaastad, Ivar
AU - Espe, Emil Knut Stenersen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - In heart failure (HF) management, noninvasive quantification of left ventricular (LV) function is rapidly evolving. Deformation parameters, such as strain, continue to challenge the central role of ejection fraction (EF) in diagnosis and prognostication of LV dysfunction in HF. The increasing recognition and use of deformation parameters motivates a conceptual discussion about what makes a parameter clinically valuable. To do this, we introduce a framework for parameter evaluation. The framework considers three aspects that are important for parameter value; 1) how these parameters couple with underlying myocardial function; 2) the evidence base of the parameters; and 3) the technical feasibility of their measurement. In particular, we emphasize that the coupling of each parameter to the underlying myocardial function (aspect 1) is crucial for parameter value. While EF offers information about cardiac dysfunction trough measuring changes in LV volume, deformation parameters more closely reflect underlying myocardial processes that contribute to cardiac pumping function. This is a fundamental advantage of deformation parameters that could explain why a growing number of studies supports their use. A close coupling to underlying function is, however, not sufficient for high clinical value by itself. A parameter also needs a strong evidence base (aspect 2) and a high degree of technical feasibility (aspect 3). By considering these three aspects, this review discusses the present and potential clinical value of EF and deformation parameters in HF management.
AB - In heart failure (HF) management, noninvasive quantification of left ventricular (LV) function is rapidly evolving. Deformation parameters, such as strain, continue to challenge the central role of ejection fraction (EF) in diagnosis and prognostication of LV dysfunction in HF. The increasing recognition and use of deformation parameters motivates a conceptual discussion about what makes a parameter clinically valuable. To do this, we introduce a framework for parameter evaluation. The framework considers three aspects that are important for parameter value; 1) how these parameters couple with underlying myocardial function; 2) the evidence base of the parameters; and 3) the technical feasibility of their measurement. In particular, we emphasize that the coupling of each parameter to the underlying myocardial function (aspect 1) is crucial for parameter value. While EF offers information about cardiac dysfunction trough measuring changes in LV volume, deformation parameters more closely reflect underlying myocardial processes that contribute to cardiac pumping function. This is a fundamental advantage of deformation parameters that could explain why a growing number of studies supports their use. A close coupling to underlying function is, however, not sufficient for high clinical value by itself. A parameter also needs a strong evidence base (aspect 2) and a high degree of technical feasibility (aspect 3). By considering these three aspects, this review discusses the present and potential clinical value of EF and deformation parameters in HF management.
KW - Deformation parameters
KW - Ejection fraction
KW - Heart failure
KW - Left ventricular function
KW - Myocardial work
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085949707&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.05.007
DO - 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.05.007
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32502560
AN - SCOPUS:85085949707
SN - 0033-0620
VL - 63
SP - 552
EP - 560
JO - Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
JF - Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
IS - 5
ER -