QUAND LE CANCER DE L'ENDOMETRE N'EST PAS UN BON CANCER

Translated title of the contribution: When endometrial cancinoma is not a good cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two groups of endometrial carcinomas (EC) are described: group 1 with associated adenomatous hyperplasia (AH) and group 2 without. Group 1 tumors are better differentiated, less invasive and almost never metastasize. Histologically, they are mostly glandular and well differentiated. Stromal foam cells were often present supporting the association with hyperestrogenism. Progesterone receptors (PR) were present in all tested cases, and their levels were high. The patients were often obese, nulliparous and had histories of estrogen intake; group 2 are less well or poorly differentiated EC, showed papillary, clear cell and anaplastic patterns, often invaded the myometrium and metastasized. PR were present in less than half of the examined cases, at low levels. The patients in this group were rarely obese, often multiparous had no history of estrogen intake; they were older than those in group 1. None of the patients of group 1 died of the disease, while about one fourth of the patients of group 2 died of EC. It was concluded that EC with no associated AH, therefore not hormonally << dependent >> are cancers of higher virulence.

Translated title of the contributionWhen endometrial cancinoma is not a good cancer
Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)513-516
Number of pages4
JournalRevue Francaise de Gynecologie et d'Obstetrique
Volume85
Issue number10
StatePublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When endometrial cancinoma is not a good cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this