Psychologic stress in the workplace and spontaneous abortion

Laura Fenster, Catherine Schaefer, Ashwini Mathur, Robert A. Hiatt, Carl Pieper, Alan E. Hubbard, Julie Von Behren, Shanna H. Swan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

111 Scopus citations

Abstract

The relation of work-related psychologic stress to spontaneous abortion was examined in a prospective study of 3,953 pregnant, employed members of a prepaid health plan in California, recruited between 1990 and 1991. Information on occupation, psychologic stress-related factors at work, social support at work, physical exertion at work, life events, pregnancy worries, and potential confounders was obtained by a telephone interview. Psychologic job stress and social support at work were assessed using an abbreviated version of the instrument developed by Karasek and colleagues (Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1986). Results from the multivariate model indicated that, overall, stressful work was not associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion. However, interactions were observed between stressful work and maternal age over 32 years (p = 0.04), cigarette smoking (p = 0.02), and primigravidity (p = 0.06). Relative to the odds ratio for stressful work in young, nonsmoking, multigravid women without a history of two or more spontaneous abortions, the odds ratios for spontaneous abortion given stressful work were higher by 2.45 (95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.03-5.81) for older women, 2.96 (95% Cl 1.16-7.52) for smokers, and 2.27 (95% Cl 0.97-5.27) for primigravid women. Am J Epidemiol 1995:142:1176-83.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1176-1183
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume142
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 1995
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Abortion
  • Occupational exposure
  • Occupational health
  • Pregnancy
  • Stress, psychological

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychologic stress in the workplace and spontaneous abortion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this