Abstract
Recent efforts have focused on developing methylation risk scores (MRS), a weighted sum of the individual’s DNA methylation (DNAm) values of pre-selected CpG sites. Most of the current MRS approaches that utilize Epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) summary statistics only include genome-wide significant CpG sites and do not consider co-methylation. New methods that relax the p-value threshold to include more CpG sites and account for the inter-correlation of DNAm might improve the predictive performance of MRS. We paired informed co-methylation pruning with P-value thresholding to generate pruning and thresholding (P+T) MRS and evaluated its performance among multi-ancestry populations. Through simulation studies and real data analyses, we demonstrated that pruning provides an improvement over simple thresholding methods for prediction of phenotypes. We demonstrated that European-derived summary statistics can be used to develop P+T MRS among other populations such as African populations. However, the prediction accuracy of P+T MRS may differ across multi-ancestry population due to environmental/cultural/social differences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 2187172 |
| Journal | Epigenetics |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Admixed population
- Clumping and thresholding
- Epigenetic scores
- Polygenic DNA methylation