TY - CHAP
T1 - Prognostic Variables
T2 - Categorizing a Prognostic Variable: Review of Methods, Code for Easy Implementation and Applications to Decision-Making about Cancer Treatments
AU - Mazumdar, Madhu
AU - Glassman, Jill R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2004 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2005/8/24
Y1 - 2005/8/24
N2 - Categorizing prognostic variables is essential for their use in clinical decision-making. Often a single outpoint that stratifies patients into high-risk and low-risk categories is sought. These categories may be used for making treatment recommendations, determining study eligibility, or to control for varying patient prognoses in the design of a clinical trial. Methods used to categorize variables include: biological determination (most desirable but often unavailable); arbitrary selection of a cutpoint at the median value; graphical examination of the data for a threshold effect; and exploration of all observed values for the one which best separates the risk groups according to a chi-squared test. The last method, called the minimum p-value approach, involves multiple testing which inflates the type I error rates. Several methods for adjusting the inflated p-values have been proposed but remain infrequently used. Exploratory methods for categorization and the minimum p-value approach with its various p-value corrections are reviewed, and code for their easy implementation is provided. The combined use of these methods is recommended, and demonstrated in the context of two cancer-related examples which highlight a variety of the issues involved in the categorization of prognostic variables.
AB - Categorizing prognostic variables is essential for their use in clinical decision-making. Often a single outpoint that stratifies patients into high-risk and low-risk categories is sought. These categories may be used for making treatment recommendations, determining study eligibility, or to control for varying patient prognoses in the design of a clinical trial. Methods used to categorize variables include: biological determination (most desirable but often unavailable); arbitrary selection of a cutpoint at the median value; graphical examination of the data for a threshold effect; and exploration of all observed values for the one which best separates the risk groups according to a chi-squared test. The last method, called the minimum p-value approach, involves multiple testing which inflates the type I error rates. Several methods for adjusting the inflated p-values have been proposed but remain infrequently used. Exploratory methods for categorization and the minimum p-value approach with its various p-value corrections are reviewed, and code for their easy implementation is provided. The combined use of these methods is recommended, and demonstrated in the context of two cancer-related examples which highlight a variety of the issues involved in the categorization of prognostic variables.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954589758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/0470023678.ch2a
DO - 10.1002/0470023678.ch2a
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84954589758
SN - 0470023651
SN - 9780470023655
VL - 1
SP - 187
EP - 208
BT - Tutorials in Biostatistics, Statistical Methods in Clinical Studies
PB - wiley
ER -