Predictive value of postoperative electrophysiologic testing of the facial nerve after cerebellopontine angle surgery

Samuel H. Selesnick, G. Paul Digoy, Yael Ptachewich, Michael Rubin, Jonathan D. Victor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Our objective was to assess the ability of postoperative electroneuronography (ENoG) and electromyography (EMG) to predict clinical facial function 1 year postoperatively in patients with facial paralysis and an intact facial nerve after cerebellopontine angle surgery. The study was a prospective, nonrandomized, uncontrolled clinical trial on an outpatient basis, at a tertiary care hospital. Primary eligibility criteria include: (1) cerebellopontine angle (CPA) surgery with anatomical preservation of facial nerve, (2) complete facial nerve paralysis; and (3) 1 year follow-up. ENoG and EMG were measured at 1 and 3 months postoperatively, House-Brackmann facial nerve grade at 1 year postoperatively. The Kendall coefficient of rank correlation demonstrated that the 1 and 3 month postoperative ENoG data were significant predictors of ultimate facial nerve outcome. Tracking multiple ENoG examinations in a single patient, over time was of little predictive value. EMG was a poor predictor of facial nerve outcome. In general, patients with delayed facial nerve paralysis had better ultimate facial function than patients with immediate paralysis. Postoperative ENoG, but not EMG was a statistically significant predictor of ultimate facial nerve outcome after CPA surgery. Patients with delayed facial paralysis had better outcomes than those with immediate facial paralysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-148
Number of pages8
JournalSkull Base Surgery
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictive value of postoperative electrophysiologic testing of the facial nerve after cerebellopontine angle surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this