Predictive value of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked responses in surgery for conductive hearing losses

Samuel H. Selesnick, Jonathan D. Victor, Ravinder K. Tikoo, David J. Eisenman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) in predicting postoperative hearing improvement in surgery for conductive hearing loss. Study Design: A prospective study of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for conductive hearing loss under general anesthesia by a single surgeon. Setting: A tertiary care university affiliated medical center. Patients: All patients undergoing surgery for conductive hearing loss by the senior author between June 25, 1993 and March 20, 1995. Interventions: Pre- and postreconstruction intraoperative BAERs; pre- and postoperative pure tone and speech audiometry. Main Outcome Measures: Changes in audiometric pure tone air-conduction thresholds, bone-air gaps (BAG), and speech reception thresholds (SRT), compared with changes in BAER wave five (V) latencies. Results: A decrease in the wave V latency on the intraoperative BAER correlates significantly with improvement in postoperative puretone air-conduction, BAG, and SRT using χ2 and linear regression analyses. Conclusions: Improvement in intraoperative BAER correlates with postoperative hearing improvement in surgery for conductive hearing loss done under general anesthesia in our population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2-9
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Otology
Volume18
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1997
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response (BAER)
  • conductive hearing loss
  • intraoperative cranial nerve monitoring
  • ossiculoplasty
  • stapedectomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictive value of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked responses in surgery for conductive hearing losses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this