TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of myelotoxicity based on bone marrow radiation-absorbed dose
T2 - Radioimmunotherapy studies using 90Y- and 177Lu-labeled J591 antibodies specific for prostate-specific membrane antigen
AU - Vallabhajosula, Shankar
AU - Goldsmith, Stanley J.
AU - Hamacher, Klaus A.
AU - Kostakoglu, Lale
AU - Konishi, Shota
AU - Milowski, Mathew I.
AU - Nanus, David M.
AU - Bander, Neil H.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - In radioimmunotherapy, myelotoxicity due to bone marrow radiation-absorbed dose is the predominant factor and frequently is the dose-limiting factor that determines the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). With 90Y- and 131I-labeled monoclonal antibodies, it has been reported that myelotoxicity cannot be predicted on the basis of the amount of radioactive dose administered or the bone marrow radiation-absorbed dose (BMrad), estimated using blood radioactivity concentration. As part of a phase I dose-escalation study in patients with prostate cancer with 90Y-DOTA-J591 (DOTA = 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N′,N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid)(30Y-J591) and 177Lu-DOTA-J591 (177Lu- J591), we evaluated the potential value of several factors in predicting myelotoxicity. Methods: Seven groups of patients (n = 28) received 370-2,775 MBq/m2 (10-75 mCi/m2) of 177Lu-J591 and 5 groups of patients (n = 27) received 185-740 MBq (5-20 mCi/m2) of 90Y-J591. Pharmacokinetics and imaging studies were performed for 1-2 wk after 177Lu treatment, whereas patients receiving 90Y had these studies performed with 111In-DOTA-J591 ( 111In-J591) as a surrogate. The BMrad was estimated based on blood radioactivity concentration. Myelotoxicity consisting of thrombocytopenia or neutropenia was graded 1-4 based on criteria of the National Cancer Institute. Results: Blood pharmacokinetics are similar for both tracers. The radiation dose (mGy/MBq) to the bone marrow was 3 times higher with 90Y (0.91 ± 0.43) compared with that with 177Lu (0.32 ± 0.10). The MTD was 647.5 MBq/m2 with 90Y-J591 and 2,590 MBq/m2 with 177Lu-J591. The percentage of patients with myelotoxicity (grade 3-4) increased with increasing doses of 90Y (r = 0.91) or 177Lu (r = 0.92). There was a better correlation between the radioactive dose administered and the BMrad with 177Lu (r = 0.91) compared with that with 90Y (r = 0.75). In addition, with 177Lu, the fractional decrease in platelets (FDP) correlates well with both the radioactive dose administered (r = 0.88) and the BMrad (r = 0.86). In contrast, with 90Y, there was poor correlation between the FDP and the radioactive dose administered (r = 0.20) or the BMrad (r = 0.26). Similar results were also observed with white blood cell toxicity. Conclusion: In patients with prostate cancer, myelotoxicity after treatment with 177Lu-J591 can be predicted on the basis of the amount of radioactive dose administered or the BMrad. The lack of correlation between myelotoxicity and 90Y-J591 BMrad may be due to several factors. 90Y-J591 may be less stable in vivo and, as a result, higher amounts of free 90Y may be localized in the bone. In addition, the cross-fire effect of high-energy β-particles within the bone and the marrow may deliver radiation dose nonuniformly within the marrow.
AB - In radioimmunotherapy, myelotoxicity due to bone marrow radiation-absorbed dose is the predominant factor and frequently is the dose-limiting factor that determines the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). With 90Y- and 131I-labeled monoclonal antibodies, it has been reported that myelotoxicity cannot be predicted on the basis of the amount of radioactive dose administered or the bone marrow radiation-absorbed dose (BMrad), estimated using blood radioactivity concentration. As part of a phase I dose-escalation study in patients with prostate cancer with 90Y-DOTA-J591 (DOTA = 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N′,N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid)(30Y-J591) and 177Lu-DOTA-J591 (177Lu- J591), we evaluated the potential value of several factors in predicting myelotoxicity. Methods: Seven groups of patients (n = 28) received 370-2,775 MBq/m2 (10-75 mCi/m2) of 177Lu-J591 and 5 groups of patients (n = 27) received 185-740 MBq (5-20 mCi/m2) of 90Y-J591. Pharmacokinetics and imaging studies were performed for 1-2 wk after 177Lu treatment, whereas patients receiving 90Y had these studies performed with 111In-DOTA-J591 ( 111In-J591) as a surrogate. The BMrad was estimated based on blood radioactivity concentration. Myelotoxicity consisting of thrombocytopenia or neutropenia was graded 1-4 based on criteria of the National Cancer Institute. Results: Blood pharmacokinetics are similar for both tracers. The radiation dose (mGy/MBq) to the bone marrow was 3 times higher with 90Y (0.91 ± 0.43) compared with that with 177Lu (0.32 ± 0.10). The MTD was 647.5 MBq/m2 with 90Y-J591 and 2,590 MBq/m2 with 177Lu-J591. The percentage of patients with myelotoxicity (grade 3-4) increased with increasing doses of 90Y (r = 0.91) or 177Lu (r = 0.92). There was a better correlation between the radioactive dose administered and the BMrad with 177Lu (r = 0.91) compared with that with 90Y (r = 0.75). In addition, with 177Lu, the fractional decrease in platelets (FDP) correlates well with both the radioactive dose administered (r = 0.88) and the BMrad (r = 0.86). In contrast, with 90Y, there was poor correlation between the FDP and the radioactive dose administered (r = 0.20) or the BMrad (r = 0.26). Similar results were also observed with white blood cell toxicity. Conclusion: In patients with prostate cancer, myelotoxicity after treatment with 177Lu-J591 can be predicted on the basis of the amount of radioactive dose administered or the BMrad. The lack of correlation between myelotoxicity and 90Y-J591 BMrad may be due to several factors. 90Y-J591 may be less stable in vivo and, as a result, higher amounts of free 90Y may be localized in the bone. In addition, the cross-fire effect of high-energy β-particles within the bone and the marrow may deliver radiation dose nonuniformly within the marrow.
KW - Lu-labeled J591 monoclonal antibody
KW - Myelotoxicity
KW - Radioimmunotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20644436713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 15872360
AN - SCOPUS:20644436713
SN - 0161-5505
VL - 46
SP - 850
EP - 858
JO - Journal of Nuclear Medicine
JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine
IS - 5
ER -