TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of cerebral aneurysm rupture risk by machine learning algorithms
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,670 participants
AU - Habibi, Mohammad Amin
AU - Fakhfouri, Amirata
AU - Mirjani, Mohammad Sina
AU - Razavi, Alireza
AU - Mortezaei, Ali
AU - Soleimani, Yasna
AU - Lotfi, Sohrab
AU - Arabi, Shayan
AU - Heidaresfahani, Ladan
AU - Sadeghi, Sara
AU - Minaee, Poriya
AU - Eazi, Seyed Mohammad
AU - Rashidi, Farhang
AU - Shafizadeh, Milad
AU - Majidi, Shahram
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - It is possible to identify unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) using machine learning (ML) algorithms, which can be a life-saving strategy, especially in high-risk populations. To better understand the importance and effectiveness of ML algorithms in practice, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to predict cerebral aneurysm rupture risk. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched without restrictions until March 20, 2023. Eligibility criteria included studies that used ML approaches in patients with cerebral aneurysms confirmed by DSA, CTA, or MRI. Out of 35 studies included, 33 were cohort, and 11 used digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as their reference imaging modality. Middle cerebral artery (MCA) and anterior cerebral artery (ACA) were the commonest locations of aneurysmal vascular involvement—51% and 40%, respectively. The aneurysm morphology was saccular in 48% of studies. Ten of 37 studies (27%) used deep learning techniques such as CNNs and ANNs. Meta-analysis was performed on 17 studies: sensitivity of 0.83 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77–0.88); specificity of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75–0.88); positive DLR of 4.81 (95% CI, 3.29–7.02) and the negative DLR of 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14–0.29); a diagnostic score of 3.17 (95% CI, 2.55–3.78); odds ratio of 23.69 (95% CI, 12.75–44.01). ML algorithms can effectively predict the risk of rupture in cerebral aneurysms with good levels of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. However, further research is needed to enhance their diagnostic performance in predicting the rupture status of IA.
AB - It is possible to identify unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) using machine learning (ML) algorithms, which can be a life-saving strategy, especially in high-risk populations. To better understand the importance and effectiveness of ML algorithms in practice, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to predict cerebral aneurysm rupture risk. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched without restrictions until March 20, 2023. Eligibility criteria included studies that used ML approaches in patients with cerebral aneurysms confirmed by DSA, CTA, or MRI. Out of 35 studies included, 33 were cohort, and 11 used digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as their reference imaging modality. Middle cerebral artery (MCA) and anterior cerebral artery (ACA) were the commonest locations of aneurysmal vascular involvement—51% and 40%, respectively. The aneurysm morphology was saccular in 48% of studies. Ten of 37 studies (27%) used deep learning techniques such as CNNs and ANNs. Meta-analysis was performed on 17 studies: sensitivity of 0.83 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77–0.88); specificity of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75–0.88); positive DLR of 4.81 (95% CI, 3.29–7.02) and the negative DLR of 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14–0.29); a diagnostic score of 3.17 (95% CI, 2.55–3.78); odds ratio of 23.69 (95% CI, 12.75–44.01). ML algorithms can effectively predict the risk of rupture in cerebral aneurysms with good levels of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. However, further research is needed to enhance their diagnostic performance in predicting the rupture status of IA.
KW - Aneurysm
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - ML
KW - Regression
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181480528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10143-023-02271-2
DO - 10.1007/s10143-023-02271-2
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38183490
AN - SCOPUS:85181480528
SN - 0344-5607
VL - 47
JO - Neurosurgical Review
JF - Neurosurgical Review
IS - 1
M1 - 34
ER -