TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients who underwent prostatectomy using routine clinical prostate multiparametric MRI and decipher genomic score
AU - Jambor, Ivan
AU - Falagario, Ugo
AU - Ratnani, Parita
AU - Perez, Ileana Montoya
AU - Demir, Kadir
AU - Merisaari, Harri
AU - Sobotka, Stanislaw
AU - Haines, George K.
AU - Martini, Alberto
AU - Beksac, Alp Tuna
AU - Lewis, Sara
AU - Pahikkala, Tapio
AU - Wiklund, Peter
AU - Nair, Sujit
AU - Tewari, Ash
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - Background: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) affects a significant proportion of patients who undergo robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a routine clinical prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and Decipher genomic classifier score for prediction of biochemical recurrence in patients who underwent RALP. Study Type: Retrospective cohort study. Subjects: Ninety-one patients who underwent RALP performed by a single surgeon, had mpMRI before RALP, Decipher taken from RALP samples, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) follow-up for >3 years or BCR within 3 years, defined as PSA >0.2 mg/ml. Field Strength/Sequence: mpMRI was performed at 27 different institutions using 1.5T (n = 10) or 3T scanners and included T2w, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), or dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Assessment: All mpMRI studies were reported by one reader using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v. 2.1 (PI-RADsv2.1) without knowledge of other findings. Eighteen (20%) randomly selected cases were re-reported by reader B to evaluate interreader variability. Statistical Tests: Univariate and multivariate analysis using greedy feature selection and tournament leave-pair-out cross-validation (TLPOCV) were used to evaluate the performance of various variables for prediction of BCR, which included clinical (three), systematic biopsy (three), surgical (six: RALP Gleason Grade Group [GGG], extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, intraoperative surgical margins [PSM], final PSM, pTNM), Decipher (two: Decipher score, Decipher risk category), and mpMRI (eight: prostate volume, PSA density, PI-RADv2.1 score, MRI largest lesion size, summed MRI lesions' volume and relative volume [MRI-lesion-percentage], mpMRI ECE, mpMRI seminal vesicle invasion [SVI]) variables. The evaluation metric was the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Forty-eight (53%) patients developed BCR. The best-performing individual features with TLPOCV AUC of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64–0.82) were RALP GGG, MRI-lesion-percentage followed by biopsy GGG (0.72, 0.62–0.82), and Decipher score (0.71, 0.60–0.82). The best performance was achieved by feature selection of Decipher+Surgery and MRI + Surgery variables with TLPOCV AUC of 0.82 and 0.81, respectively. Data Conclusion: Relative lesion volume measured on a routine clinical mpMRI failed to outperform Decipher score in BCR prediction. Level of Evidence: 3. Technical Efficacy: Stage 2. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1075–1085.
AB - Background: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) affects a significant proportion of patients who undergo robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a routine clinical prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and Decipher genomic classifier score for prediction of biochemical recurrence in patients who underwent RALP. Study Type: Retrospective cohort study. Subjects: Ninety-one patients who underwent RALP performed by a single surgeon, had mpMRI before RALP, Decipher taken from RALP samples, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) follow-up for >3 years or BCR within 3 years, defined as PSA >0.2 mg/ml. Field Strength/Sequence: mpMRI was performed at 27 different institutions using 1.5T (n = 10) or 3T scanners and included T2w, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), or dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Assessment: All mpMRI studies were reported by one reader using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v. 2.1 (PI-RADsv2.1) without knowledge of other findings. Eighteen (20%) randomly selected cases were re-reported by reader B to evaluate interreader variability. Statistical Tests: Univariate and multivariate analysis using greedy feature selection and tournament leave-pair-out cross-validation (TLPOCV) were used to evaluate the performance of various variables for prediction of BCR, which included clinical (three), systematic biopsy (three), surgical (six: RALP Gleason Grade Group [GGG], extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, intraoperative surgical margins [PSM], final PSM, pTNM), Decipher (two: Decipher score, Decipher risk category), and mpMRI (eight: prostate volume, PSA density, PI-RADv2.1 score, MRI largest lesion size, summed MRI lesions' volume and relative volume [MRI-lesion-percentage], mpMRI ECE, mpMRI seminal vesicle invasion [SVI]) variables. The evaluation metric was the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Forty-eight (53%) patients developed BCR. The best-performing individual features with TLPOCV AUC of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64–0.82) were RALP GGG, MRI-lesion-percentage followed by biopsy GGG (0.72, 0.62–0.82), and Decipher score (0.71, 0.60–0.82). The best performance was achieved by feature selection of Decipher+Surgery and MRI + Surgery variables with TLPOCV AUC of 0.82 and 0.81, respectively. Data Conclusion: Relative lesion volume measured on a routine clinical mpMRI failed to outperform Decipher score in BCR prediction. Level of Evidence: 3. Technical Efficacy: Stage 2. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1075–1085.
KW - Decipher
KW - biochemical recurrence
KW - multiparametric MRI
KW - prostate MRI
KW - robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073985578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jmri.26928
DO - 10.1002/jmri.26928
M3 - Article
C2 - 31566845
AN - SCOPUS:85073985578
SN - 1053-1807
VL - 51
SP - 1075
EP - 1085
JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 4
ER -