TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
T2 - A prospective cohort study
AU - van Es, Nick
AU - Louzada, Martha
AU - Carrier, Marc
AU - Tagalakis, Vicky
AU - Gross, Peter L.
AU - Shivakumar, Sudeep
AU - Rodger, Marc A.
AU - Wells, Philip S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Background: The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients despite anticoagulant therapy is high. Clinical factors and pro-coagulant markers may identify high-risk patients and guide decisions about intensifying anticoagulation therapy. Aims: To evaluate whether serial measurements of pro-coagulant markers can identify patients at high risk of recurrent VTE. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective cohort study, patients with active cancer and acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were enrolled. Patients received standard low-molecular-weight heparin therapy and were followed for 6 months. D-dimer and soluble P-selectin levels were measured at baseline and 1, 4, 5, 12, and 24 weeks post treatment initiation. The association between recurrent VTE and a previously developed risk score, baseline values of the biomarkers, and individual relative changes from baseline were assessed. Results: We enrolled 117 cancer patients (22% lung, 21% colorectal, 9% breast) with a mean age of 63 years; 62% had metastatic cancer. Eleven patients (9.4%) developed recurrent VTE, including two cases of fatal pulmonary embolism. VTE recurrence rates were 7.8% (95% CI, 3.1–18) in patients with a risk score of ≤0 points compared to 11% (95% CI, 5.2–20) for those with a score of ≥1 point (hazard ratio 1.3; 95% CI, 0.39–4.5). Baseline P-selectin levels but not D-dimer levels were significantly associated with a high risk of recurrence; the risk was four-fold higher in patients with elevated P-selectin levels than in those with normal levels (hazard ratio 4.0; 95% CI, 1.1–14). Changes in biomarker levels during treatment were not associated with recurrent VTE. Conclusion: Baseline P-selectin but not D-dimer levels predict recurrent VTE and may be a valuable addition to clinical prediction rules to select patients for more intensive therapy or closer observation.
AB - Background: The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients despite anticoagulant therapy is high. Clinical factors and pro-coagulant markers may identify high-risk patients and guide decisions about intensifying anticoagulation therapy. Aims: To evaluate whether serial measurements of pro-coagulant markers can identify patients at high risk of recurrent VTE. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective cohort study, patients with active cancer and acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were enrolled. Patients received standard low-molecular-weight heparin therapy and were followed for 6 months. D-dimer and soluble P-selectin levels were measured at baseline and 1, 4, 5, 12, and 24 weeks post treatment initiation. The association between recurrent VTE and a previously developed risk score, baseline values of the biomarkers, and individual relative changes from baseline were assessed. Results: We enrolled 117 cancer patients (22% lung, 21% colorectal, 9% breast) with a mean age of 63 years; 62% had metastatic cancer. Eleven patients (9.4%) developed recurrent VTE, including two cases of fatal pulmonary embolism. VTE recurrence rates were 7.8% (95% CI, 3.1–18) in patients with a risk score of ≤0 points compared to 11% (95% CI, 5.2–20) for those with a score of ≥1 point (hazard ratio 1.3; 95% CI, 0.39–4.5). Baseline P-selectin levels but not D-dimer levels were significantly associated with a high risk of recurrence; the risk was four-fold higher in patients with elevated P-selectin levels than in those with normal levels (hazard ratio 4.0; 95% CI, 1.1–14). Changes in biomarker levels during treatment were not associated with recurrent VTE. Conclusion: Baseline P-selectin but not D-dimer levels predict recurrent VTE and may be a valuable addition to clinical prediction rules to select patients for more intensive therapy or closer observation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041467921&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.01.009
DO - 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.01.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 29353682
AN - SCOPUS:85041467921
SN - 0049-3848
VL - 163
SP - 41
EP - 46
JO - Thrombosis Research
JF - Thrombosis Research
ER -