TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting the individualized risk of poor adherence to ART medication among adolescents living with HIV in Uganda
T2 - the Suubi+Adherence study
AU - Brathwaite, Rachel
AU - Ssewamala, Fred M.
AU - Neilands, Torsten B.
AU - Okumu, Moses
AU - Mutumba, Massy
AU - Damulira, Christopher
AU - Nabunya, Proscovia
AU - Kizito, Samuel
AU - Sensoy Bahar, Ozge
AU - Mellins, Claude A.
AU - McKay, Mary M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International AIDS Society
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Introduction: Achieving optimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among adolescents living with HIV (ALWHIV) is challenging, especially in low-resource settings. To help accurately determine who is at risk of poor adherence, we developed and internally validated models comprising multi-level factors that can help to predict the individualized risk of poor adherence among ALWHIV in a resource-limited setting such as Uganda. Methods: We used data from a sample of 637 ALWHIV in Uganda who participated in a longitudinal study, “Suubi+Adherence” (2012 to 2018). The model was developed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) penalized regression to select the best subset of multi-level predictors (individual, household, community or economic-related factors) of poor adherence in one year’s time using 10-fold cross-validation. Seventeen potential predictors included in the model were assessed at 36 months of follow-up, whereas adherence was assessed at 48 months of follow-up. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination and calibration measures. Results: For the model predicting poor adherence, five of the 17 predictors (adherence history, adherence self-efficacy, family cohesion, child poverty and group assignment) were retained. Its ability to discriminate between individuals with and without poor adherence was acceptable; area under the curve (AUC) = 69.9; 95% CI: 62.7, 72.8. There was no evidence of possible areas of miscalibration (test statistic = 1.20; p = 0.273). The overall performance of the model was good. Conclusions: Our findings support prediction modelling as a useful tool that can be leveraged to improve outcomes across the HIV care continuum. Utilizing information from multiple sources, the risk prediction score tool applied here can be refined further with the ultimate goal of being used in a screening tool by practitioners working with ALWHIV. Specifically, the tool could help identify and provide early interventions to adolescents at the highest risk of poor adherence and/or viral non-suppression. However, further fine-tuning and external validation may be required before wide-scale implementation.
AB - Introduction: Achieving optimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among adolescents living with HIV (ALWHIV) is challenging, especially in low-resource settings. To help accurately determine who is at risk of poor adherence, we developed and internally validated models comprising multi-level factors that can help to predict the individualized risk of poor adherence among ALWHIV in a resource-limited setting such as Uganda. Methods: We used data from a sample of 637 ALWHIV in Uganda who participated in a longitudinal study, “Suubi+Adherence” (2012 to 2018). The model was developed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) penalized regression to select the best subset of multi-level predictors (individual, household, community or economic-related factors) of poor adherence in one year’s time using 10-fold cross-validation. Seventeen potential predictors included in the model were assessed at 36 months of follow-up, whereas adherence was assessed at 48 months of follow-up. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination and calibration measures. Results: For the model predicting poor adherence, five of the 17 predictors (adherence history, adherence self-efficacy, family cohesion, child poverty and group assignment) were retained. Its ability to discriminate between individuals with and without poor adherence was acceptable; area under the curve (AUC) = 69.9; 95% CI: 62.7, 72.8. There was no evidence of possible areas of miscalibration (test statistic = 1.20; p = 0.273). The overall performance of the model was good. Conclusions: Our findings support prediction modelling as a useful tool that can be leveraged to improve outcomes across the HIV care continuum. Utilizing information from multiple sources, the risk prediction score tool applied here can be refined further with the ultimate goal of being used in a screening tool by practitioners working with ALWHIV. Specifically, the tool could help identify and provide early interventions to adolescents at the highest risk of poor adherence and/or viral non-suppression. However, further fine-tuning and external validation may be required before wide-scale implementation.
KW - ART adherence
KW - HIV/AIDS
KW - adolescents
KW - prediction modelling
KW - viral load
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107938289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jia2.25756
DO - 10.1002/jia2.25756
M3 - Article
C2 - 34105865
AN - SCOPUS:85107938289
SN - 1758-2652
VL - 24
JO - Journal of the International AIDS Society
JF - Journal of the International AIDS Society
IS - 6
M1 - e25756
ER -