TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting recurrent mitral regurgitation after mitral valve repair for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation
AU - Kron, Irving L.
AU - Hung, Judy
AU - Overbey, Jessica R.
AU - Bouchard, Denis
AU - Gelijns, Annetine C.
AU - Moskowitz, Alan J.
AU - Voisine, Pierre
AU - O'Gara, Patrick T.
AU - Argenziano, Michael
AU - Michler, Robert E.
AU - Gillinov, Marc
AU - Puskas, John D.
AU - Gammie, James S.
AU - Mack, Michael J.
AU - Smith, Peter K.
AU - Sai-Sudhakar, Chittoor
AU - Gardner, Timothy J.
AU - Ailawadi, Gorav
AU - Zeng, Xin
AU - O'Sullivan, Karen
AU - Parides, Michael K.
AU - Swayze, Roger
AU - Thourani, Vinod
AU - Rose, Eric A.
AU - Perrault, Louis P.
AU - Acker, Michael A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Objectives The Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network recently reported no difference in the primary end point of left ventricular end-systolic volume index at 1 year postsurgery in patients randomized to repair (n = 126) or replacement (n = 125) for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. However, patients undergoing repair experienced significantly more recurrent mitral regurgitation than patients undergoing replacement (32.6% vs 2.3%). We examined whether baseline echocardiographic and clinical characteristics could identify those who will develop moderate/severe recurrent mitral regurgitation or die. Methods Our analysis includes 116 patients who were randomized to and received mitral valve repair. Logistic regression was used to estimate a model-based probability of recurrence or death from baseline factors. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed from these estimated probabilities to determine classification cut-points maximizing accuracy of prediction based on sensitivity and specificity. Results Of the 116 patients, 6 received a replacement before leaving the operating room; all other patients had mild or less mitral regurgitation on intraoperative echocardiogram after repair. During the 2-year follow-up period, 76 patients developed moderate/severe mitral regurgitation or died (53 mitral regurgitation recurrences, 13 mitral regurgitation recurrences and death, and 10 deaths). The mechanism for recurrent mitral regurgitation was largely mitral valve leaflet tethering. Our model (including age, body mass index, sex, race, effective regurgitant orifice area, basal aneurysm/dyskinesis, New York Heart Association class, history of coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, or ventricular arrhythmias) yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82. Conclusions The model demonstrated good discrimination in identifying patients who will survive 2 years without recurrent mitral regurgitation after mitral valve repair. Although our results require validation, they offer a clinically relevant risk score for selection of surgical candidates for this procedure.
AB - Objectives The Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network recently reported no difference in the primary end point of left ventricular end-systolic volume index at 1 year postsurgery in patients randomized to repair (n = 126) or replacement (n = 125) for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. However, patients undergoing repair experienced significantly more recurrent mitral regurgitation than patients undergoing replacement (32.6% vs 2.3%). We examined whether baseline echocardiographic and clinical characteristics could identify those who will develop moderate/severe recurrent mitral regurgitation or die. Methods Our analysis includes 116 patients who were randomized to and received mitral valve repair. Logistic regression was used to estimate a model-based probability of recurrence or death from baseline factors. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed from these estimated probabilities to determine classification cut-points maximizing accuracy of prediction based on sensitivity and specificity. Results Of the 116 patients, 6 received a replacement before leaving the operating room; all other patients had mild or less mitral regurgitation on intraoperative echocardiogram after repair. During the 2-year follow-up period, 76 patients developed moderate/severe mitral regurgitation or died (53 mitral regurgitation recurrences, 13 mitral regurgitation recurrences and death, and 10 deaths). The mechanism for recurrent mitral regurgitation was largely mitral valve leaflet tethering. Our model (including age, body mass index, sex, race, effective regurgitant orifice area, basal aneurysm/dyskinesis, New York Heart Association class, history of coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, or ventricular arrhythmias) yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82. Conclusions The model demonstrated good discrimination in identifying patients who will survive 2 years without recurrent mitral regurgitation after mitral valve repair. Although our results require validation, they offer a clinically relevant risk score for selection of surgical candidates for this procedure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926196353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.120
DO - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.120
M3 - Article
C2 - 25500293
AN - SCOPUS:84926196353
SN - 0022-5223
VL - 149
SP - 752-761.e1
JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
IS - 3
ER -