PrECOG PrE0807: A Phase 1b Feasibility Trial of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Without and with Lirilumab in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Ineligible for or Refusing Cisplatin-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Petros Grivas, Vadim S. Koshkin, Xiangying Chu, Suzanne Cole, Rohit K. Jain, Robert Dreicer, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Debasish Sundi, Benjamin A. Gartrell, Matthew D. Galsky, Brianna Woo, Elsa Li-Ning-Tapia, Noah M. Hahn, Michael A. Carducci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy (RC) improves overall survival (OS) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, many patients are cisplatin ineligible; therefore, new treatment options are needed. Nivolumab without/with lirilumab prior to RC was investigated in cisplatin-ineligible patients in this phase 1b trial (NCT03532451) to determine its safety/feasibility. METHODS: Patients with localized MIBC received two doses of nivolumab (480 mg) alone (cohort 1) or with lirilumab (240 mg; cohort 2) prior to RC. Cohorts were enrolled sequentially. The key eligibility criteria were cT2-4aN0-1M0 stage and cisplatin ineligibility/refusal. The primary endpoint was the rate of grade (G) ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The key secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients who underwent RC >6 wk after the last dose, CD8+ T-cell density change between pretreatment transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and post-treatment RC, ypT0N0, <ypT2N0 rates, 2-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS), and OS. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Among 43 patients enrolled (n = 13, cohort 1; n = 30, cohort 2), 13 and 29 completed intended neoadjuvant therapy, respectively, in cohorts 1 and 2, and 41 underwent RC. The median time from the last dose to RC was 4 wk. The G3 TRAEs occurred in 0% (90% confidence interval [CI] 0-21%) of patients in cohort 1 and 7% (90% CI 1-20%) in cohort 2; all these TRAEs resolved and no G4/5 TRAEs occurred. No patient had delayed RC for >6 wk. In cohorts 1 and 2, ypT0N0 rates for patients with MIBC and RC were 17% and 21%, <ypT2N0 rates were 25% and 32%, 2-yr RFS rates were 73% and 71%, and 2-yr OS rates were 82% and 89%, respectively. CD8+ T-cell density increased significantly from TURBT to RC in cohort 2. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Neoadjuvant nivolumab-based immunotherapy was safe, feasible, and well tolerated in cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC. Although ypT0N0 rates were lower than expected, 2-yr survival rates seem to be comparable with those of other neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials. Nivolumab is being evaluated in the CA-017-078 trial (NCT03661320). PATIENT SUMMARY: For patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer unable to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, treatment with nivolumab without and with lirilumab prior to radical cystectomy was safe, feasible, and well tolerated. Nivolumab-based immunotherapy showed lower pathologic response rates than but similar survival rates to other neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)914-922
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean urology oncology
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2024

Keywords

  • Anti-KIR antibody
  • Bladder cancer
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors
  • Neoadjuvant therapy
  • Urothelial carcinoma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'PrECOG PrE0807: A Phase 1b Feasibility Trial of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Without and with Lirilumab in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Ineligible for or Refusing Cisplatin-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this