Precautionary Allergen Labeling: Avoidance for All?

Allison Schaible, Jamie Kabourek, Wendy Elverson, Carina Venter, Amanda Cox, Marion Groetch

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Precautionary allergen labeling (PAL) suggests the risk of unintended allergen presence (UAP) in food but is unregulated in most countries and inconsistently applied by food manufacturers. This review evaluates the current use of PAL, its relevance to allergic consumers, and weighs possible advantages and disadvantages of avoiding products with PAL. Recent Findings: In most countries, manufacturers are free to decide whether, when, and how to apply PAL resulting in inconsistencies and consumer confusion. Patients with food allergy often interpret PAL incorrectly and without guidance from their health care providers. Health care providers are also prone to misinterpreting PAL, indicating a need for better education. Consumers desire guidance on whether to avoid products with PAL or not. Summary: Until further regulatory guidance is available, shared decision-making between patient and provider is required to offer individualized, rather than one–size-fits-all, approaches to PAL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-94
Number of pages14
JournalCurrent Allergy and Asthma Reports
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Allergen avoidance
  • Allergen cross-contact
  • Food allergy
  • Precautionary allergen labeling
  • Shared decision-making
  • Unintended allergen presence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Precautionary Allergen Labeling: Avoidance for All?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this