TY - JOUR
T1 - Postoperative Spine Infection
T2 - Diagnosis and Management
AU - Dowdell, James
AU - Brochin, Robert
AU - Kim, Jun
AU - Overley, Samuel
AU - Oren, Jonathan
AU - Freedman, Brett
AU - Cho, Samuel
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This Supplement was supported by funding from AOSpine North America.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - Study Design: Review article. Objectives: A review of the literature on postoperative spinal infections, their diagnosis, and management. Methods: A systematic computerized Medline literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and EMBASE. The electronic databases were searched for publication dates from the last 10 years. The searches were performed from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) used by the National Library of Medicine. Specifically, MeSH terms “spine,” “infections,” “management,” and “diagnosis” were used. Results: Currently, the gold standard for diagnosis of postoperative spine infection is positive deep wound culture. Many of the current radiologic and laboratory tests can assist with the initial diagnosis and monitoring treatment response. Currently erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging with and without contrast are used in combination to establish diagnosis. Management of postoperative spine infection involves thorough surgical debridement and targeted antibiotic therapy. Conclusions: Postoperative spine infection is a not uncommon complication following surgery that may have devastating consequences for a patient’s short- and long-term health. A high index of suspicion is needed to make an early diagnosis.
AB - Study Design: Review article. Objectives: A review of the literature on postoperative spinal infections, their diagnosis, and management. Methods: A systematic computerized Medline literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and EMBASE. The electronic databases were searched for publication dates from the last 10 years. The searches were performed from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) used by the National Library of Medicine. Specifically, MeSH terms “spine,” “infections,” “management,” and “diagnosis” were used. Results: Currently, the gold standard for diagnosis of postoperative spine infection is positive deep wound culture. Many of the current radiologic and laboratory tests can assist with the initial diagnosis and monitoring treatment response. Currently erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging with and without contrast are used in combination to establish diagnosis. Management of postoperative spine infection involves thorough surgical debridement and targeted antibiotic therapy. Conclusions: Postoperative spine infection is a not uncommon complication following surgery that may have devastating consequences for a patient’s short- and long-term health. A high index of suspicion is needed to make an early diagnosis.
KW - diagnosis
KW - infection
KW - management
KW - postoperative
KW - spine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058672066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2192568217745512
DO - 10.1177/2192568217745512
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85058672066
SN - 2192-5682
VL - 8
SP - 37S-43S
JO - Global Spine Journal
JF - Global Spine Journal
IS - 4_suppl
ER -