TY - JOUR
T1 - Posthypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference under cycloplegia
AU - Raz, Amir
AU - Landzberg, Kim S.
AU - Schweizer, Heather R.
AU - Zephrani, Zohar R.
AU - Shapiro, Theodore
AU - Fan, Jin
AU - Posner, Michael I.
PY - 2003/9
Y1 - 2003/9
N2 - Recent data indicate that under a specific posthypnotic suggestion to circumvent reading, highly suggestible subjects successfully eliminated the Stroop interference effect. The present study examined whether an optical explanation (e.g., visual blurring or looking away) could account for this finding. Using cyclopentolate hydrochloride eye drops to pharmacologically prevent visual accommodation in all subjects, behavioral Stroop data were collected from six highly hypnotizables and six less suggestibles using an optical setup that guaranteed either sharply focused or blurred vision. The highly suggestibles performed the Stroop task when naturally vigilant, under posthypnotic suggestion not to read, and while visually blurred; the less suggestibles ran naturally vigilant, while looking away, and while visually blurred. Although visual accommodation was precluded for all subjects, posthypnotic suggestion effectively eliminated Stroop interference and was comparable to looking away in controls. These data strengthen the view that Stroop interference is neither robust nor inevitable and support the hypothesis that posthypnotic suggestion may exert a top-down influence on neural processing.
AB - Recent data indicate that under a specific posthypnotic suggestion to circumvent reading, highly suggestible subjects successfully eliminated the Stroop interference effect. The present study examined whether an optical explanation (e.g., visual blurring or looking away) could account for this finding. Using cyclopentolate hydrochloride eye drops to pharmacologically prevent visual accommodation in all subjects, behavioral Stroop data were collected from six highly hypnotizables and six less suggestibles using an optical setup that guaranteed either sharply focused or blurred vision. The highly suggestibles performed the Stroop task when naturally vigilant, under posthypnotic suggestion not to read, and while visually blurred; the less suggestibles ran naturally vigilant, while looking away, and while visually blurred. Although visual accommodation was precluded for all subjects, posthypnotic suggestion effectively eliminated Stroop interference and was comparable to looking away in controls. These data strengthen the view that Stroop interference is neither robust nor inevitable and support the hypothesis that posthypnotic suggestion may exert a top-down influence on neural processing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041534393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00024-2
DO - 10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00024-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 12941281
AN - SCOPUS:0041534393
SN - 1053-8100
VL - 12
SP - 332
EP - 346
JO - Consciousness and Cognition
JF - Consciousness and Cognition
IS - 3
ER -