Abstract
In this paper we explore post retraction citations to retracted papers. The reasons for retractions in our sample were data manipulation, small sample size, scientific misconduct, and duplicate publication by the authors. We found, that the huge majority of the citations are positive, and the citing papers usually fail to mention that the cited article was retracted. Retracted articles are freely available at the publishers' site, which is probably a catalyst for receiving more citations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 23-29 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | CEUR Workshop Proceedings |
| Volume | 1610 |
| State | Published - 2016 |
| Event | Joint Workshop on Bibliometric-enhanced Information Retrieval and Natural Language Processing for Digital Libraries, BIRNDL 2016, co-located with the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2016 - Newark, United States Duration: 23 Jun 2016 → 23 Jun 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Post retraction citations in context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver