Post-heart transplant survival is inferior at low-volume centers across all risk strata

Mark J. Russo, Alexander Iribarne, Rachel Easterwood, Ali N. Ibrahimiye, Ryan Davies, Kimberly N. Hong, Deborah D. Ascheim, Annetine C. Gelijns, Yoshifumi Naka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background-: Previous studies have demonstrated a relationship between increasing center volume and cardiac transplant outcomes. The purpose of this study was to confirm a relationship between post-heart transplant outcomes and center experience and to determine whether this relationship persists among low-and high-risk heart transplant recipient-donor pairs. Methods and results-: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) provided deidentified patient-level data. Analysis included 8029 heart transplant recipients aged ≥18 years and transplanted between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2006 with follow-up available through February 3, 2009. The primary outcome was observed 1-year posttransplant graft survival. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate expected 1-year survival for recipients. Threshold analysis identified 3 discrete risk groups of transplant recipients: high-risk, moderate-risk, and low-risk. Three discrete risk strata for center volume: low (<10.5 recipients/yr), intermediate (10.5 to 47 recipients/yr), and high (>47 recipients/yr) were also identified. χ test was used to compare 1-year survival at low-and intermediate-with high-volume centers. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, annual center volume was significantly associated with posttransplant graft survival at 1 year (odds ratio [OR]=0.995, 0.992 to 0.999; P=0.010) and primary graft failure (OR=0.985, 0.972 to 0.997; P=0.015), but not stroke (OR=0.996, 0.990 to 1.003; P=0.295), infection (OR=1.001, 0.998 to 1.003; P=0.613), or dialysis (OR=1.001, 0.997 to 1.005; P=0.522). Log-rank test demonstrated significant difference in survival between volume groups with respect to high-risk (P=0.0032) and low-risk (P=0.00415), but not moderate-risk (P=0.128) patients. Conclusions-: A direct relationship existed between increasing center volume and improved graft survival. Across all recipient-donor pair risk strata, posttransplant graft survival at 1 year was significantly lower at low-volume centers. The volume-outcomes relationship was strongest in the highest-risk recipient-donor category.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S85-S91
JournalCirculation
Volume122
Issue number11 SUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - 14 Sep 2010

Keywords

  • heart transplantation
  • hospital volume
  • outcomes
  • survival

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Post-heart transplant survival is inferior at low-volume centers across all risk strata'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this