Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes shows context-dependent effects across populations

  • The biobank at the Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine (CCPM)
  • , VA Million Veteran Program (MVP)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Polygenic risk scores hold prognostic value for identifying individuals at higher risk of type 2 diabetes. However, further characterization is needed to understand the generalizability of type 2 diabetes polygenic risk scores in diverse populations across various contexts. We systematically characterize a multi-ancestry type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score among 244,637 cases and 637,891 controls across diverse populations from the Population Architecture Genomics and Epidemiology Study and 13 additional biobanks and cohorts. Polygenic risk score performance is context dependent, with better performance in those who are younger, male, without hypertension, and not obese or overweight. Additionally, the polygenic risk score is associated with various diabetes-related cardiometabolic traits and type 2 diabetes complications, suggesting its utility for stratifying risk of complications and identifying shared genetic architecture between type 2 diabetes and other diseases. These findings highlight the need to account for context when evaluating polygenic risk score as a tool for type 2 diabetes risk prognostication and the potentially generalizable associations of type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score with diabetes-related traits, despite differential performance in type 2 diabetes prediction across diverse populations. Our study provides a comprehensive resource to characterize a type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score.

Original languageEnglish
Article number8632
JournalNature Communications
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes shows context-dependent effects across populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this