Placement technique impacts gastrostomy tube-related complications amongst head and neck cancer patients

David Forner, Florence Mok, Neil Verma, Irene Karam, David Goldstein, Kevin Higgins, Danny Enepekides, Ashlie Nadler, Robyn Pugash, Zain Husain, Kelvin Chan, Martin Smoragiewicz, Lawrence Cohen, Jeffrey W. Hazey, Eleanor C. Fung, Stephen Y. Kang, Nolan B. Seim, Colleen Simpson, Antoine Eskander

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement is essential for the provision of enteral nutrition in select head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Minimally invasive tube placement is facilitated through one of two techniques, push or pull, but there have been conflicting results regarding safety profiles of these procedures. The objectives of this study were to determine the association of PEG insertion technique with gastrostomy tube complications, including stomal metastases. Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of patients with HNC undergoing PEG insertion by either the pull (gastroscope assisted) or push (fluoroscopy assisted) technique was performed. Tube-related complications included infection, dislodgement, deterioration, leak, and other. Adjusted analysis was performed via a multivariable logistic regression model. Results: 1,575 patients were included across three institutions. Tube-related complications occurred in 36% of patients, the most common being peristomal leak (13%) and infection (16%). The push technique (OR 2.66, 95% CI: 1.42–4.97), and the presence of T4 disease (OR 4.62, 95% CI: 1.58–13.51), were associated with a greater risk of developing any tube-related complication. Infection rates were similar between pull and push cohorts. All detected stoma metastases occurred with the pull technique, with an overall prevalence of 0.32% amongst the cohort. Conclusions: The push technique is associated with a greater risk of developing any tube-related complication, but the rate of stomal metastases may be higher with the pull technique. There is potential for quality improvement measures to improve tube-related complications associated with either technique.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105903
JournalOral Oncology
Volume130
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Gastrostomy tube
  • Quality improvement
  • Stoma metastasis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Placement technique impacts gastrostomy tube-related complications amongst head and neck cancer patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this